Teams

LLTC

Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 Ladies Monday Evening · 4.5 Ladies

16 players · average NTRP 4.43 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-02vs River Oaks - IBSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDawna Kelly / Heather Mee vs Sarah Pletcher / Paige Hagle4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStefanie Carlson / Diana Tully vs Allison Lui / Kathleen Dizon6-4, 6-2
2026-02-23vs River Oaks - IBSLost 04
L#1 DoublesDiana Tully / Heather Mee vs Sarah-Jane Jackett / Elizabeth Zdeblick1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDawna Kelly vs Michelle Chuang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDena Day / SIMONA Toliver vs Kathleen Dizon / Anjali Iyer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStefanie Carlson / Chiara Combs vs Jennifer Chien / Chelsea Grear2-6, 4-6
2026-02-16vs River Oaks - IBSLost 13
W#1 DoublesDiana Tully / Heather Mee vs Elizabeth Zdeblick / Mary Volf6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDawna Kelly vs Amanda Lenss5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDena Day / Candace Craft vs Kaye Williams / Donna Miller1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Palmer / Stefanie Carlson vs Allison Lui / Sarah Pletcher6-7, 6-7
2026-02-10vs River Oaks - IBSLost 13
L#1 DoublesDena Day / Amanda Thompson vs Molly Neff / Donna Miller2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDawna Kelly vs Anjali Iyer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Mee / Stefanie Carlson vs Paige Hagle / Melissa Stryker2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSIMONA Toliver / Jennifer Cho vs Luiza Loureiro / Kaye Williams7-5, 0-1
2026-02-02vs River Oaks - IBSSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDena Day / Amanda Thompson vs Anjali Iyer / Tammy Nasse2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDawna Kelly vs Donna Miller3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChiara Combs / Candace Craft vs Elizabeth Zdeblick / Katie McCord3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Tully / Jennifer Cho vs Luiza Loureiro / Sarah Pletcher7-6, 6-2
2026-01-26vs River Oaks - IBSLost 12
L#1 DoublesValeria Murray / Lorena Raull vs Amanda Lenss / Molly Neff0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStefanie Carlson / Candace Craft vs Melissa Stryker / Chelsea Grear6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Cho / Dena Day vs Jennifer Chien / Allison Lui6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2026-01-19vs River Oaks - IBSLost 04
L#1 DoublesDiana Tully / Charlotta Wharton vs Paige Hagle / Melissa Stryker6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Mee vs Katie McCord2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSIMONA Toliver / Dawna Kelly vs Sarah-Jane Jackett / Mary Volf3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDena Day / Amanda Thompson vs Tammy Nasse / Jennifer Chien5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlotta Wharton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Diana Tully
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.07
Dawna Kelly
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.95
Chiara Combs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
SIMONA Toliver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Candace Craft
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Jennifer Cho
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Dena Day
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.71
Gemma Joffroy
published
3.68
Heather Mee
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.67
Stefanie Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Betsy Smith
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Donnetha Johnson
published
Lorena Raull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Philippa Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valeria Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Mee + Dawna Kelly12753% games+7.8% vs expected
Candace Craft + Heather Mee4450% games+5.1% vs expected
Chiara Combs + Donnetha Johnson3256% gamesnot enough data
Heather Mee + Stefanie Carlson044 matchesnot enough data
Gemma Joffroy + Lorena Raull224 matchesnot enough data
SIMONA Toliver + Dawna Kelly134 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Smith + Stefanie Carlson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlotta Wharton
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Diana Tully
66W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Dawna Kelly
37W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Chiara Combs
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
SIMONA Toliver
39W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.92
4.5
Candace Craft
22W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.85
Jennifer Cho
71W–38L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4.5
Dena Day
26W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.79
Gemma Joffroy
18W–20L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Heather Mee
78W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
Stefanie Carlson
21W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Betsy Smith
46W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Donnetha Johnson
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorena Raull
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Philippa Palmer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Valeria Murray
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.