Teams

Sarcone

2024 Virginia Beach Tri-Level 18 & Over · Virginia Beach Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-13vs SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Kiger / Tippins Kitchin vs Kathy Courage / Cindy Aston6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-03vs Beth KulasWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelsey Sarcone / Courtney Kellam vs Beth Kulas / Alyse Chickey6-3, 6-3
2024-08-30vs VIRGINIA BEACH - KezmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Kiger / Anne Tew vs Veronica Cummings / Tessa Robinson1-6, 3-6
2024-08-20vs SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Lori Cox vs Yuli Reams / Kelly Long2-6, 0-6
2024-08-16vs Beth KulasWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Cox / Courtney Kellam vs Janet Brashear / Beth Skolnick6-3, 6-3
2024-08-02vs SmithWon 10
W#2 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Lori Cox vs Tammy Willett / Betty Domanski6-1, 6-1
2024-07-24vs Beth KulasLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Tew / Lauren Kiger vs Caroline Dozier / Audra Rich2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Tippins Kitchin
published
3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.69
Kathy Good
published
3.66
Lauren Kiger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.65
Courtney Kellam
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Kelsey Sarcone
published
3.35
Kathryn Fraim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
published
3.29
Anne Tew
published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Newton
published
2.93
Kathryn Kramer
published
Amy Lenthall
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsey Sarcone + Rebecca Hoover6356% games−4.7% vs expected
Courtney Kellam + Lori Cox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tippins Kitchin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Kathy Good
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Lauren Kiger
79W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.66
4
Courtney Kellam
120W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Kelsey Sarcone
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Kathryn Fraim
72W–55L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Anne Tew
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Rebecca Newton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Kathryn Kramer
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Amy Lenthall
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.