Teams

KY/LEX/Wickline

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.79 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-04vs KY/LEX GallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Simmons / Wendy Kogler vs Mary Diggins / Amy Cunningham6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Bramble / Gretchen Holsclaw vs Nina Begley / Ria Voth6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Mendenhall / Leslie Stone vs Betty Grey / Marvetta Overstreet6-2, 6-3
2025-03-29vs KY/LEX GallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesPat Miller / Brooks Lundy vs Amy Cunningham / Monica Mestanza6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGretchen Holsclaw / Carol Robey vs Marvetta Overstreet / Sarah Hancock6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Mendenhall / Ann Boone vs Sally Baker / Ria Voth6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Laurie Larkin
published
3.89
Gretchen Holsclaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Beth Mendenhall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Susan Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Anne Faulconer
published 4
Carol Robey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Leslie Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Lisa Grissom
published
3.61
Kathryn Whiteman
published
3.58
Ann Boone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Sandra Wickline
published
3.57
Cindy Bramble
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Ellen Miller
published
Brooks Lundy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Connie Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Wendy Kogler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Bramble + Gretchen Holsclaw3256% games−3.4% vs expected
Anne Faulconer + Laurie Larkin404 matchesnot enough data
Anne Faulconer + Cindy Bramble213 matchesnot enough data
Connie Bishop + Ann Boone213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Simmons + Gretchen Holsclaw303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Larkin
45W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Gretchen Holsclaw
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Beth Mendenhall
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
Susan Simmons
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Anne Faulconer
23W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carol Robey
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Stone
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Lisa Grissom
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kathryn Whiteman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Ann Boone
32W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Sandra Wickline
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Cindy Bramble
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Ellen Miller
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Brooks Lundy
1W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Connie Bishop
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Wendy Kogler
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.