Teams

Hopkins/Nashville

2025 Combo 40 & Over - Nashville · 5.5 Women - Wednesday AM & PM

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-17vs Fisher/McClurg/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Stephanie Skinner vs Kellyn Bailey / Meredith Smith6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhaedra Yachimski / Reagan Yount vs Victoria Lubnik / Melinda Norris-Munro1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Megan Michaels vs Melissa Burton / Mindy Cone4-6, 3-6
2025-09-10vs PM Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Stephanie Skinner vs Lynn Blocher / Jess Lee1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDana Latreille / Stephanie Brasili vs Heather Gillum / Lore Mandrell7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Amy Coggin vs Jennifer Mui / Alicia Herrera7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-08-27vs Fisher/McClurg/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Megan Michaels vs Melissa Burton / NICOLE BATEMAN2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPhaedra Yachimski / Reagan Yount vs Kellyn Bailey / Meredith Smith0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Luteran / Amy Coggin vs Julie Comstock / Resha Blivens7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs PM Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Giselle Huston vs Jess Lee / Lynn Blocher5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan de la O / Janine Hopkins vs Micol Cecchi / Lore Mandrell2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Hagan / Reagan Yount vs Heather Gillum / EMILY MARTIN2-6, 1-6
2025-08-06vs Fisher/McClurg/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Giselle Huston vs Amy Kocian / NICOLE BATEMAN1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegan de la O / Amy Coggin vs Holly Fisher / Lori McClurg0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Latreille / Stephanie Brasili vs Mindy Cone / Julie Comstock7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-30vs PM Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Giselle Huston vs Lore Mandrell / Micol Cecchi0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Hagan / Stephanie Skinner vs Heather Gillum / Jess Lee2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Luteran / Stephanie Brasili vs Olga Jacobsen / Ryoko Yamanobe4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women - Wednesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.91
Kaelin Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.90
Dana Latreille
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Megan de la O
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Funck
published 3
2.62
Theresa Hagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Megan Michaels
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Janine Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Jennifer Luteran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Amy Coggin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Giselle Huston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phaedra Yachimski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Reagan Yount
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Brasili
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan de la O + Traci Gilbert-Stafford9850% games+0.4% vs expected
Kaelin Cramer + Traci Gilbert-Stafford6749% games+0.0% vs expected
Megan de la O + Kaelin Cramer3245% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Brasili + Amy Coggin123 matchesnot enough data
Kaelin Cramer + Dana Latreille123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Gilbert-Stafford
32W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Kaelin Cramer
30W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Dana Latreille
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Megan de la O
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cindy Funck
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Hagan
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Megan Michaels
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Janine Hopkins
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Jennifer Luteran
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Amy Coggin
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Giselle Huston
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Phaedra Yachimski
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reagan Yount
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Brasili
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.