Teams

BHSC Netflix 4.0-Voelmle

2024 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-04vs Forest Lakes Overheads-CancienneSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Sarah Caldwell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue Frazier / Allison Evanow vs Jenny Furlow / Heather Toombs6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-28vs ACAC-HertelLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Voelmle / Alexis Ryan vs Stacy Moren / Lauren Reichman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Wiley / Mary Voelmle vs Debra Lafond / Evan Mooney6-2, 6-2
2024-05-07vs ACAC-HertelLost 01
L#1 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Tammy Hertel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-30vs Farmington-WarrenWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Voelmle / Christine Barth vs Coles Warren / Ashley McCarron5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesMary Voelmle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-16vs Farmington-WarrenLost 01
L#2 SinglesMary Voelmle vs Coles Warren6-7, 4-6
2024-04-09vs ACAC-HertelLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Morris / Mary Voelmle vs Sonia Brandon / Kristin Carter3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Alexis Ryan
published 4
Allison Evanow
published 4
3.68
Janette Murphy
published
3.64
Belinda Bullock
published 4
3.64
Mary Voelmle
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Cindy Grace
published 4
3.59
3.45
Dorothy Ramsey
published
3.35
Katherine Morris
published
3.26
Sue Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
published
Victoria Tremaglio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Grace + Farrell Vangelopoulos213 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Ryan + Belinda Bullock303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexis Ryan
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Allison Evanow
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janette Murphy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Belinda Bullock
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Mary Voelmle
147W–99L career · 8 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cindy Grace
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
Farrell Vangelopoulos
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Dorothy Ramsey
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
Katherine Morris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Sue Frazier
35W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Tremaglio
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.