Teams

O'Kelley

2026 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W Adult 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-16vs BoulosLost 01
L#2 DoublesVirginia Dailey / Vanessa Fernandez vs Beata Ewa Los / Denise Klees6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-09vs SirianniWon 10
W#2 DoublesVannessa Glover / Vanessa Fernandez vs Katie Stevens-Magler / Maryrose Sirianni6-1, 6-2
2026-02-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Devorace / Vanessa Fernandez vs Denise Klees / Kerri Foster2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-09vs Leon/HuffmanLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohanna Calhoun / Vanessa Fernandez vs Kristen Knapp / Mary MacKo4-6, 3-6
2026-01-19vs Leon/HuffmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Devorace / Vanessa Fernandez vs Laura Gibson / Jan Murdock6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Kimberly Curry
published
Amy Cade
published 3
Amy O'Kelley
published 3
2.60
MICHELLE BEMBRY
published
2.57
Vanessa Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Marla Vickers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Cyndi Knox
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Johanna Calhoun
published
Karen Devorace
published
Kim Bertron
published
Kristin Harrison
published
Vannessa Glover
published
Virginia Dailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Curry + MICHELLE BEMBRY4251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Curry
19W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Amy Cade
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Amy O'Kelley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
MICHELLE BEMBRY
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60
Vanessa Fernandez
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
Marla Vickers
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.54
2.5
Cyndi Knox
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Johanna Calhoun
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Devorace
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Bertron
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristin Harrison
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Vannessa Glover
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Virginia Dailey
26W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.