Teams

BC-MCC/NahiaHossain

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Denise Coit
published 4
2.95
Nissa Diederich
published
2.94
2.91
Zoe Frank
published
2.77
Shelby Campion
published
Amy Pearce
published 3
Dana Leyland
published 3
2.69
2.53
Cindy Emanuel
published 3
2.50
Linda Buchanan
published
2.49
Candice Maloney
published 3
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
Janet Wisialowski
published
Julie Fields
published
Leah Niehaus
published
Nicola Harrison
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Coit
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Nissa Diederich
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Zoe Frank
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
2.91
Shelby Campion
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amy Pearce
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dana Leyland
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.53
Linda Buchanan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Candice Maloney
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44
Janet Wisialowski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leah Niehaus
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicola Harrison
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.