Teams

ROLLING HILLS CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#2 DoublesJoyce Noah-Vanhoucke / Judy McKie vs Amy Kleckner / Kendall Laidlaw1-6, 1-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Mira Schwirtz
published
3.83
Lori Torkelson
published
3.80
Laura Hoppe
published
3.65
Miriam Sittenfeld
published
3.63
Pam Dineva
published
3.49
Jeri Obert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Erin Henke
published 3.5
3.42
Jennifer Anakar
published
3.39
Jennifer Tetrick
published
3.39
Lorie Lambert
published
3.36
Vesa Becam
published
3.35
Lucie Powers
published
3.28
Theresia Treadway
published
3.26
Jonell Langley
published
3.23
Kristine Banton
published
3.07
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeri Obert + Mira Schwirtz3259% games+11.5% vs expected
Mira Schwirtz + Lori Torkelson4250% games−5.0% vs expected
Erin Henke + Laura Hoppe314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mira Schwirtz
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Lori Torkelson
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Laura Hoppe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.80
Miriam Sittenfeld
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Pam Dineva
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jeri Obert
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Erin Henke
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jennifer Anakar
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jennifer Tetrick
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Lorie Lambert
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Vesa Becam
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
Lucie Powers
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Theresia Treadway
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.28
Jonell Langley
9W–25L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Kristine Banton
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.