Teams

Miller 18+

2022 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-20vs Reefe 18+Won 31
W#1 DoublesEsther Wang / Suzanne Krudys vs Kathy Greene / Amanda Mason6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKate Ansalvish vs Giselle Medina4-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesNancy Trimble / Susan Fitzgerald vs Monica DeAgostino / Teresa Reefe6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEunice Winfree / Laura McNay vs Lesley Leonard / Michelle Shipley6-0, 6-1
2022-06-13vs Kessler 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Krudys / Laura McNay vs Kathleen Maiden / Meghan Bresee4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Esther Wang vs Kristi Stilen-Lare / Roxanna Nemec7-5, 4-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Valerie Pierce vs Janine Kaganzev / Jodi Hathaway0-6, 3-6
2022-06-11vs Reefe 18+Won 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Esther Wang vs Veronica Best / Liliana Freund6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Jones / Deanne Iverson vs Kristen Hostler / Julie Zaldumbide6-4, 6-2
2022-06-07vs Reefe 18+Won 21
L#1 DoublesMillette Miller / Cintya Leveque vs Amy LaMoure / Jamia Arner4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKate Ansalvish vs Casey Reno3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Krudys / Eunice Winfree vs Kristen Hostler / Lesley Leonard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-04vs Kessler 18+Won 40
W#1 DoublesMillette Miller / Cintya Leveque vs Kelly Temple / Meghan Meade6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKate Ansalvish vs Evelien Josselin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Esther Wang vs Kathleen Maiden / Sarah Kessler6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDeanne Iverson / Paula Mittel vs Roxanna Nemec / Stephanie Heinrichs6-3, 6-2
2022-05-31vs Reefe 18+Won 31
W#1 DoublesEsther Wang / Laura Haney vs Jamia Arner / Elizabeth Liotta4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKate Ansalvish vs Giselle Medina6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Carson / Nancy Trimble vs Kristen Hostler / Hilary Broder6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Sirian / Eunice Winfree vs Jennifer Willie / Erika Gilbert2-6, 4-6
2022-05-26vs Kessler 18+Won 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Trimble / Diane Carson vs Mary Beth Herrera / Kristi Stilen-Lare4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Ansalvish / Esther Wang vs Stephanie Heinrichs / Trisha Kinman6-3, 6-2
2022-05-17vs Kessler 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Ansalvish / Valerie Pierce vs Sabrina Alban / Jodie Phillips6-7, 1-6
2022-05-10vs Reefe 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesDeanne Iverson / Nancy Trimble vs Jamia Arner / Elizabeth Liotta6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKate Ansalvish vs Mollye Lipton6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Paula Mittel vs Megan Wilhelm / Jennifer Willie6-2, 6-1
2022-05-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCintya Leveque / Suzanne Krudys vs Jennifer Wheat / Kelly Temple6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kate Ansalvish
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.45
Deanne Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Cintya Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Suzanne Krudys
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
3.16
Laura McNay
published
3.08
Holly Erdely
published 3.5
3.04
Eunice Winfree
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Loan Nguyen
published
Millette Miller
published
Valerie Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + Cintya Leveque134 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Krudys + Cintya Leveque213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Ansalvish
75W–52L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Deanne Iverson
165W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–233L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Laura McNay
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–102L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Eunice Winfree
80W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 5 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Pierce
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.