Teams

MCL VARGHESE

2024 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

21 players · average NTRP 2.92 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Diana Ahmad
published 3
3.04
Angela Uptmore
published 3
2.99
Lindsey Childs
published
2.90
Linda Stumpff
published
2.85
Katherine Dickinson
published
2.69
Elizabeth Varghese
published
2.69
Elizabeth Varghese
published
2.69
Dagmar Kopinski
published 3
2.65
Lucy Johnson
published
2.64
Barbara McGinnis
published 3
2.63
Jo Anne Golaz
published
2.63
Jo Anne Golaz
published
2.57
Keri Vaughn
published
2.39
Allison Speer
published 2.5
Lori Voss
published
Marcy Dale
published
Petra Townsend
published
Prema Natarajan
published
Prema Natarajan
published
Rachel Knapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Petra Townsend + Jo Anne Golaz5455% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Dickinson + Angela Uptmore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecilia Gallardo Solano
41W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Diana Ahmad
27W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Angela Uptmore
19W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
Lindsey Childs
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Linda Stumpff
8W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Katherine Dickinson
11W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Elizabeth Varghese
14W–55L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Elizabeth Varghese
14W–55L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Dagmar Kopinski
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Lucy Johnson
5W–17L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Barbara McGinnis
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
Jo Anne Golaz
23W–46L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jo Anne Golaz
23W–46L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Keri Vaughn
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Allison Speer
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.39
Lori Voss
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcy Dale
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Petra Townsend
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Prema Natarajan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Prema Natarajan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Knapp
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.