Teams

Mixed Metaphors

2026 Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.39 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-09-08vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Willard / Yngrid Sierra vs DIANE CASANOVA / Stewart Royals2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Appel / Kristin Draper vs George Sybert / Kathleen Cullins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-30vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Amos / Kristin Draper vs Scott A Green / DIANE CASANOVA1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Scott Stickels vs Kathleen Cullins / George Sybert6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Smith / Wendy Hubbert vs Leann Gibbs / Michael Ritter0-6, 1-6
2026-08-27vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Mullins / Yngrid Sierra vs Mike Kelly / DIANE CASANOVA0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShaun Edwards / Bonnie Catalano vs Karen Yannone / Scott A Green7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Amos / Wendy Hubbert vs Elizabeth Jacobson / Michael McGowan3-6, 1-6
2026-08-25vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Mullins / Nona Pucciariello vs Mike Kelly / Leann Gibbs0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Smith / Yngrid Sierra vs Karen Yannone / George Sybert1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScott Stickels / Karin Mottus vs Michael Bernhard / Cyndi Casey0-6, 5-7
2026-08-06vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Willard / Nona Pucciariello vs DIANE CASANOVA / Mike Kelly7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Draper / Shaun Edwards vs Karen Yannone / Michael Ritter6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKim Neiss / Karl Gordon vs Sarah Perkins / Michael Bernhard1-6, 0-6
2026-08-02vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Appel / Laura Laabs vs DIANE CASANOVA / Stewart Royals3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKarl Gordon / Karin Mottus vs Kathleen Cullins / Michael Ritter3-6, 0-6
2026-07-27vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Amos / Kim Neiss vs Scott A Green / Elizabeth Jacobson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Mullins / Bonnie Catalano vs George Sybert / Maria Birnkammer3-6, 0-6
2026-07-23vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Willard / Nona Pucciariello vs Stewart Royals / DIANE CASANOVA2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShaun Edwards / Laura Laabs vs Michael Bernhard / Elizabeth Jacobson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Amos / Bonnie Catalano vs Michael McGowan / Karen Yannone4-6, 0-6
2026-07-19vs Kelly/JacobsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Stickels / Kim Neiss vs Cyndi Casey / Scott A Green4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Appel / Bonnie Catalano vs DIANE CASANOVA / Stewart Royals2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKarl Gordon / Wendy Hubbert vs Kathleen Cullins / Mike Kelly0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kelly/Jacobson50132670
2Mixed Metaphors0521327172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Shaun Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Andrew Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Nona Pucciariello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Laura Laabs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
James Appel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Scott Stickels
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Kim Neiss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Yngrid Sierra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Kristin Draper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
William Willard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Karin Mottus
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Bonnie Catalano
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Wendy Hubbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karl Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Amos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Amos + Kristin Draper0520% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shaun Edwards
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Andrew Mullins
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Nona Pucciariello
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Laura Laabs
177W–206L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
James Appel
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Scott Stickels
28W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–232L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Kristin Draper
39W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
William Willard
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Karin Mottus
37W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Bonnie Catalano
49W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Wendy Hubbert
18W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Karl Gordon
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Amos
0W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.