Teams

Richards/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs McCarty/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Wider-Burroughs / Ann Marie Wallace vs Randi Mullaney / Gabriela Harsanyi3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Richards / Maria Bunch vs Patricia Hayes / Michele Smith1-6, 2-5
2026-04-25vs Simonetti/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Wider-Burroughs / Marilyn Leblanc vs Debra Sneed / Shelley Spiro1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Martin / Lora Bridgewater vs Margaret Vestal / Andrea Bienstock1-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs Kershner/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Marie Wallace / Laurita Jackson vs Patricia Alfonso / Deborah Kershner1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Patterson / Lora Bridgewater vs Sharon Dertien / Dana Holland-Beickert0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMina Chung / Marilyn Leblanc vs Lori Fairless / Joanne Sandefer0-6, 3-6
2026-04-11vs Sutton/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaurita Jackson / Ann Marie Wallace vs Elizabeth Novick / Teri McDowell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMina Chung / Wendy Wider-Burroughs vs Ana Paula Pereira / Glaucia Novoa6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Patterson / Lora Bridgewater vs Lura Turner / Mary Sutton2-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs Eddy/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesMina Chung / Maria Bunch vs Robin Thomas / Diane Brower3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Evans / Wendy Wider-Burroughs vs Catherine Eddy / Sheila Carro1-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Goodnight/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Marie Wallace / Veronica Anthony vs Kelly McCool / Gail Paige2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Patterson / Lisa Evans vs Maria Dannemiller / Tricia Pickett0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Wider-Burroughs / Mina Chung vs Debi Bird / Kathleen Cates1-6, 4-6
2026-03-21vs Mills/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Sharp / Laurita Jackson vs Michelle Stockton / Julie Mullins2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Richards / Constance Dyson vs Barb Lansky / Laura Huss1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMina Chung / Wendy Wider-Burroughs vs Carla Higgins / Debbie Churchey1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jacqueline Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Veronica Anthony
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Ann Marie Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Constance Dyson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Laurita Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Wendy Wider-Burroughs
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Mina Chung
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Sandra Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Lora Bridgewater
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Marilyn Leblanc
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Cheryl Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Maria Bunch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Constance Dyson + Veronica Anthony1444% games−9.4% vs expected
Lora Bridgewater + Cheryl Patterson01028% games−17.6% vs expected
Wendy Wider-Burroughs + Mina Chung134 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Richards + Veronica Anthony033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Sharp
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Anthony
16W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ann Marie Wallace
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Constance Dyson
6W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Laurita Jackson
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.87
Wendy Wider-Burroughs
1W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.85
Mina Chung
7W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sandra Richards
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.71
Lora Bridgewater
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
Marilyn Leblanc
0W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Cheryl Patterson
0W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
Maria Bunch
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.