Teams

LEECHAR/Stewart/50&over6.5W

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 W Monday DAY

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-03vs Hancock - RiccioWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Marinell / Molly Marks vs Terri Brown / Alexandria Dahms6-3, 6-2
2024-05-27vs Herons Glen - SavageLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Marinell / Linda Rodgers vs Gayle Kloosterman / Susan Gregor5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-13vs Hancock - RiccioWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Marinell / Annie McMurray vs Elise Benkard / Denise Iannuzzi6-4, 6-1
2024-04-22vs Hancock - RiccioWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Marinell / Annie McMurray vs Gwyn Patterson / Christy Jo Ellis6-0, 6-2
2024-04-15vs Herons Glen - SavageWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Marinell / Sylvia Lachapelle vs Gayle Kloosterman / Sandy Herde6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Monday DAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Annie McMurray
published 3.5
3.43
Amy Marinell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Gwen Burdzy
published
3.21
Laurie Stewart
published
3.20
Diana Metzger
published 3.5
3.03
Marcia Disharoon
published
3.02
Elaine Kearney
published
3.01
Kim Deck
published
2.92
Mary Witham
published
Linda Rodgers
published
Patricia Highley
published
Patty Haller
published
Sylvia Lachapelle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Stewart + Amy Marinell4455% games+9.3% vs expected
Elaine Kearney + Mary Witham134 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Kearney + Kim Deck303 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Stewart + Gwen Burdzy213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Marinell + Patty Haller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annie McMurray
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Amy Marinell
96W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Gwen Burdzy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Laurie Stewart
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Diana Metzger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Marcia Disharoon
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Elaine Kearney
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
Kim Deck
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Mary Witham
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
Linda Rodgers
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Highley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patty Haller
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sylvia Lachapelle
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.