Teams

OC LLW LNRC - Avi

2024 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.35 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesEileen MacKenzie / Noh Jin Park vs Emily Porter / Jon Peabody4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-07-28vs OC Los Cab - CalvinWon 10
W#2 DoublesEileen MacKenzie / Brian Richardson vs Bruce Phung / Julie Le6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.97
Erynne Mercado
published 5
4.47
Matt Szen
published 4.5
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
published 4.5
BaoAnh Nguyen
published 4.5
4.11
Justin Green
published
4.07
4.07
Noh Jin Park
published
4.07
Miwa Ishisaka
published
4.06
Avinash Mehta
published 4
4.01
Julian Jaramillo
published
4.01
Eileen MacKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Brian Richardson
published 4.5
3.87
Ayako Hasegawa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Sung Eun Kim
published
3.86
Jaala Zabrocki
published 4
3.84
Eric Liu
published 4
Dany Chittamany
published 4
3.56
Kent Burner
published
3.31
Kristi Wechsler
published
Rafael Nieto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Jaramillo + Sung Eun Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erynne Mercado
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
4.97
5
Elizaveta Buckbee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Matt Szen
85W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
BaoAnh Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Justin Green
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
DANIEL KIRKPATRICK
31W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
4.07
Noh Jin Park
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.07
Miwa Ishisaka
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Avinash Mehta
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.06
Julian Jaramillo
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
4.5
Eileen MacKenzie
86W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Brian Richardson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Ayako Hasegawa
64W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Sung Eun Kim
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Jaala Zabrocki
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Eric Liu
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Dany Chittamany
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kent Burner
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
Kristi Wechsler
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Rafael Nieto
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.