← Teams

SHC-Christensen

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Andrea Hobi
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Tami Socolofsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Katherine Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Nicole Vedder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Rebecca Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Rozita Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Watt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Monica Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Julie Trujillo
published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-06-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPaula Watt / Katherine Farrell vs Kelly Asbridge / Linda Binns6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Christensen / Rozita Walsh vs Paula Conway / Chikako Hokanson6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Hobi / Kerri Patrick vs Michele Snyder / Janice Ackley4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Paula Watt vs Paula Conway / Kathy Ramsey1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Christensen / Tami Socolofsky vs Catherine Greenblatt / Michele Snyder6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Hobi / Nicole Vedder vs Nozomi Bray / Donna Klindt6-3, 6-1
2023-06-03Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKim Christensen / Tami Socolofsky vs Gina Ariosa / Ann Cassin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Trujillo / Monica Christensen vs Anna Boyarshinova / Sandy Swift6-0, 7-5
2023-05-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Griffin / Paula Watt vs Traina Giles / Denise Angel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRozita Walsh / Tami Socolofsky vs Lisa Wisthoff / Pauline Reilly2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShella Razon-Lumetta / Nicole Vedder vs Stacy Naccachian / Christine Taylor6-2, 6-4
2023-05-13Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMonica Christensen / Julie Trujillo vs Jian Xu / Lyann Nguyen6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicole Vedder / Rebecca Harris vs Janna McDougall / Robin Fernstrom6-2, 6-0
2023-04-30Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hobi vs Lupine Swanson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRozita Walsh / Monica Christensen vs Adrienne VanBeckhoven / Marilyn Sims6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Harris / Eliza Oh vs Gail Bolte / JaReda Webb6-1, 6-3
2023-04-23Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hobi vs Sara Vanderhoff7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Harris / Jacqui Slominski vs Courtney Laing / Edwardeen Hilts6-4, 6-2
2023-04-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBarbara Griffin / Katherine Farrell vs Kaie Wellman / Michelle Johnson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Tami Socolofsky
31W–36L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Katherine Farrell
43W–32L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Nicole Vedder
32W–37L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rebecca Harris
8W–16L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rozita Walsh
18W–16L career
13%84%3%
3.19
3.5
Paula Watt
43W–47L career
15%82%2%
3.17
3.5
Monica Christensen
27W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.14
3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3.5
Julie Trujillo
15W–18L career
11%89%0%
3.11

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.