← Teams

WHRC-Bolte

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Lowblad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Janis Locenieks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Bill Lowblad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Gail Bolte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Bing Hu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Matt Bolte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Thor Deacon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Potter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Pat Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Skip Potter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Alan Potts
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Judy Potts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-03-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKathy Ottesen / Janis Locenieks vs Trylla Lembke / Wes Schalk6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSkip Potter / Jennifer Potter vs Tammy LaFrazia / Andy LaFrazia6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJudy Potts / Bing Hu vs Denise Dawkins / Mark Dawkins6-3, 6-3
2022-03-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJudy Potts / Alan Potts vs Andrea Robertson / Bruce Robertson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Potter / Skip Potter vs Colleen Walker / Joshua Smith5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPat Kaplan / Bing Hu vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Steve Harris6-2, 7-5
2022-02-20Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBing Hu / Kathy Ottesen vs Colleen Nolan / Brad Grenham6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJudy Potts / Alan Potts vs Nicole Floyd / John Boelling7-5, 6-0
2022-02-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBill Lowblad / Mary Lowblad vs Christopher Graham / Edwardeen Hilts7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGail Bolte / Matt Bolte vs Melissa Gibson / Frederick Buckman6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Potter / Skip Potter vs Dorothy Cofield / Robert Kelly6-1, 6-4
2022-02-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPat Kaplan / Thor Deacon vs Laurie Horenstein / Jon Monson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Ottesen / Bing Hu vs Jennifer Kuhr / Hien Lu6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJudy Potts / Alan Potts vs Theresa Fichter / Kok Waii Wong6-3, 6-1
2022-01-28Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKathy Ottesen / Matt Bolte vs William Pinelli / Chiharu Olsson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Potts / Alan Potts vs Craig Frasier / Diane di Vito6-1, 7-6
2022-01-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKathy Ottesen / Janis Locenieks vs Sebastian Llados Vila / Cathleen Lang6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGail Bolte / Matt Bolte vs Adam Rainey / Nozomi Bray6-2, 6-2
2022-01-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesPat Kaplan / Thor Deacon vs Bin He / Harish Krishnamurthy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Potts / Alan Potts vs Sev Flores / Debbie Spitzer6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSkip Potter / Jennifer Potter vs John Liao / Jinquan Wu6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Lowblad
123W–61L career
4%95%1%
3.73
3.5
Janis Locenieks
41W–21L career
2%89%9%
3.34
3.5
Bill Lowblad
92W–61L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Gail Bolte
93W–77L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Bing Hu
2W–5L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Matt Bolte
74W–78L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Thor Deacon
36W–39L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jennifer Potter
38W–53L career
2%98%1%
3.24
3.5
Pat Kaplan
25W–50L career · type A
18%81%0%
3.11
3
Skip Potter
43W–73L career
0%79%21%
3.00
3
Alan Potts
13W–41L career
not enough data
—
3
Judy Potts
10W–36L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.