Teams

JRhoadesSARC

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-06vs BRoss/BTownsend 6.5 ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Sokol / Rick Lowe vs Brent Townsend / Brian Ross0-6, 1-6
2022-09-29vs RElliottLost 02
L#1 DoublesChad Sokol / Robert Moore vs David Hill / Ronald Elliott2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDarshan Patel / Rick Lowe vs Sean Krause / Matt Phillips2-6, 1-6
2022-09-15vs TLaughery NRCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad Sokol / Robert Peters vs Rick Booth / Tom Laughery6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-13vs LWilliams40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Kelly / Rick Lowe vs Lance Williams / Jason Widen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChad Sokol / Michael Caiola vs Paul Brinckerhoff / Rick Rushton3-6, 2-6
2022-09-13vs Gchristopher40Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRick Lowe / Nipul Shah vs Alex Radulovic / Thomas Sewitsky0-6, 1-6
2022-08-28vs MGentryWon 10
W#3 DoublesChad Sokol / Kevin Johnston vs Mark Gentry / Marty Kocurek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-18vs BRoss/BTownsend 6.5 ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Sokol / Michael Tadych vs Steve Crell / Rex Bickley0-6, 3-6
2022-08-11vs PGugliottaLost 02
L#2 DoublesChad Sokol / Michael Caiola vs Graham Wright / Ivan Tseng1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Rick Lowe vs Darian Spell / Mitchell Wolborsky4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Brian Kaulback
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Darshan Patel
published 3.5
3.12
Rick Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Chad Sokol
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.74
Jason Grieco
published 3
2.46
Nipul Shah
published
Michael Caiola
published
Michael Tadych
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kaulback + Chad Sokol1543% gamesnot enough data
Brian Kaulback + Rick Lowe134 matchesnot enough data
Chad Sokol + Rick Lowe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Kaulback
53W–67L career · 1 line in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Darshan Patel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Rick Lowe
50W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chad Sokol
36W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Jason Grieco
59W–102L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Nipul Shah
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
Michael Caiola
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Tadych
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.