Teams

RVW - Lam

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring '26 · Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-18vs CCRC - CassellLost 14
W#1 DoublesDavid Bell / David Hartmann vs Jeff Johnston / Fain Dye7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTim Burket vs Sterling Hamilton1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEddie Miranda / Tom Addyman Jr vs Craig Adamski / Tony Kramer7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Simons / Roberto Gonzalez vs Tom Battey / Gagan Batra2-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesKwane Welcher / Henry Lam vs Keith Finch / John Bradley6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-04vs Woodside - ReeseWon 31
W#1 DoublesSammy Crawford / David Bell vs Tommy Grier / Douglas Stahura6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTom Addyman Jr / Eddie Miranda vs Stephen Huntley / John Davis6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJonathan Harwood / Mike Simons vs Wayne Frei / Gregory Reese5-7, 3-6
W#4 DoublesTim Burket / Kwane Welcher vs Rob Bruno / Gustavo Hernandez7-6, 6-3
2026-02-25vs CCRC - CassellLost 14
L#1 DoublesDavid Hartmann / Eddie Miranda vs Tony Kramer / James Gregory7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTim Burket vs Sterling Hamilton6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSammy Crawford / David Bell vs Fain Dye / Jeff Johnston6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMike Simons / Jonathan Harwood vs Steve Cassell / Gagan Batra0-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesHenry Lam / Vishal Arora vs John Bradley / Bill Rogier2-6, 3-6
2026-02-11vs Woodside - ReeseLost 13
W#1 DoublesDavid Hartmann / Eddie Miranda vs Tommy Grier / Bryan Pittman6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesVishal Arora vs Wayne Frei4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMike Simons / Jonathan Harwood vs Scott Hirsch / Matthew Wilson2-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesKerry Olmstead / Kwane Welcher vs Stephen Huntley / John Davis6-7, 4-6
2026-02-04vs CCRC - CassellWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Hartmann / Eddie Miranda vs Fain Dye / Tom Shimp6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSammy Crawford / Michael Elmer vs Craig Adamski / Keith Finch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJonathan Harwood / Henry Lam vs Tony Kramer / Tom Battey2-6, 2-6
2026-01-21vs Woodside - ReeseLost 14
W#1 DoublesDavid Hartmann / David Bell vs Stephen Huntley / Wayne Frei3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKwane Welcher vs Matthew Wilson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSammy Crawford / Tom Addyman Jr vs Tommy Grier / Douglas Stahura4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEddie Miranda / Roberto Gonzalez vs Gustavo Hernandez / Rob Bruno4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesKerry Olmstead / Mike Simons vs Jeffrey Crenshaw / Scott Hirsch4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC - Cassell5122824242
2Woodside - Reese24102041301
3RVW - Lam24111941297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
David Hartmann
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.38
Tim Burket
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Eddie Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Sammy Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Tom Addyman Jr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jonathan Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Mike Simons
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Kwane Welcher
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Kerry Olmstead
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Vishal Arora
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Henry Lam
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roberto Gonzalez
published
Shawn Risher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Hartmann + Eddie Miranda3257% games+3.9% vs expected
Kerry Olmstead + Mike Simons6649% games−1.7% vs expected
Henry Lam + Vishal Arora3645% games−3.3% vs expected
Henry Lam + Jonathan Harwood044 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Harwood + Mike Simons044 matchesnot enough data
Eddie Miranda + Tom Addyman Jr314 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Olmstead + Tom Addyman Jr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Hartmann
55W–16L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Tim Burket
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Eddie Miranda
45W–33L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Sammy Crawford
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Tom Addyman Jr
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Jonathan Harwood
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Mike Simons
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Kwane Welcher
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Kerry Olmstead
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Vishal Arora
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Henry Lam
5W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Roberto Gonzalez
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shawn Risher
3W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.