Teams

MRC:Love All:Kim

2025 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.5 Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-12vs MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:OrbanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTrish Rosa / Rachel Yimoyines vs Stefanie Kreiger / Stela McManus6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElena Kim vs Andrea Fleischman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMiyako Kinoshita / Mina Kim vs Mai Fried / MaryJo McGonagle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Zupkus / Dana Manning vs Daisy Qin / Cheryl Thorpe6-2, 6-1
2025-07-10vs MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/PilligWon 31
W#1 DoublesNicole Daddona / Rachel Yimoyines vs Maggie Nava / Terry Nolan6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJuliana Foster vs Sarah Leclerc6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeigh Libero / Trish Rosa vs Sharon Tralies Walsky / Jen Pillig6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSilvia Islam / Nancy Hawley vs CHRISTINE CHARLES / Jean Bacon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-29vs NHH:Fireballs:GershfeldSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathryn Hanson / Jennifer Avari vs Svetlana Gershfeld / Claudelle Natividad Le6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElena Kim vs Lesia Comperatore2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Cabral / Tammy MacAdams vs Rita King / Linda Sadinsky6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Cochrane / Mina Kim vs Lillian Garcia / Peg Oliveira5-7, 4-2
2025-06-19vs EBT:40-Love Summer:BandakSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNicole Daddona / Rachel Yimoyines vs AMY MCCORMACK / Christina Morgan6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAna Murray vs Leah Joseph2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Chan Jones / Miyako Kinoshita vs Ali Cordova / Heather Dever6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBetsy Demeyer / Nancy Anderson vs Erin Benvegnu / Karen Hanley6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-08vs MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/PilligWon 31
W#1 DoublesNancy Hawley / Silvia Islam vs Lynn Atkins / Julie Bastarache6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Cochrane vs Chihwa Tang6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaggie Chan Jones / Leigh Libero vs Terry Nolan / Kelli Montanaro6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJuliana Foster / Mina Kim vs Jen Pillig / Janice Lareau6-2, 6-4
2025-06-05vs EBT:40-Love Summer:BandakLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Avari / Trish Rosa vs AMY MCCORMACK / Christina Morgan3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Libero vs Leah Joseph3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSilvia Islam / Diane Sullivan vs Karen Hanley / Pam Wilcox1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDana Manning / Janet Zupkus vs Teena Joseph / Jill Vitti6-2, 6-2
2025-05-29vs MIT:MID COURT CRISIS:OrbanWon 40
W#1 DoublesKathryn Hanson / Leigh Libero vs Samantha Cooper / Stefanie Kreiger7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAna Murray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Cabral / Janet Zupkus vs Nicole Kaya / Wanling Zhu6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Demeyer / Tammy MacAdams vs Mai Fried / Jill Grego3-6, 7-6
2025-05-29vs NHH:Fireballs:GershfeldWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicole Daddona / Trish Rosa vs Sheila Cimmino / Susan Griffiths6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachel Yimoyines vs Lesia Comperatore6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaggie Chan Jones / Miyako Kinoshita vs Svetlana Gershfeld / Peg Oliveira6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJuliana Foster / Diane Sullivan vs Wendy Feldman / Linda Sadinsky7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 3.5 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Juliana Foster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.58
Rachel Yimoyines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.56
Nicole Daddona
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.44
Jennifer Avari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Ana Murray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Maggie Chan Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Alexandra Cabral
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Leigh Libero
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Tammy MacAdams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Nancy Hawley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Kathryn Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Miyako Kinoshita
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Trish Rosa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Betsy Demeyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Dana Manning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Silvia Islam
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Elizabeth Cochrane
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Elena Kim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jackie Donnelly
published
Janet Zupkus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mina Kim
published
Nancy Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Daddona + Rachel Yimoyines16364% games+16.7% vs expected
Silvia Islam + Mina Kim3252% games+9.3% vs expected
Leigh Libero + Maggie Chan Jones10168% games+9.3% vs expected
Tammy MacAdams + Alexandra Cabral6168% games+6.4% vs expected
Betsy Demeyer + Mina Kim7558% games+4.0% vs expected
Alexandra Cabral + Jackie Donnelly6154% games+4.0% vs expected
Janet Zupkus + Betsy Demeyer4157% games+3.8% vs expected
Trish Rosa + Leigh Libero9256% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juliana Foster
34W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Rachel Yimoyines
52W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Nicole Daddona
69W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Jennifer Avari
125W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Ana Murray
112W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Maggie Chan Jones
53W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
4
Alexandra Cabral
81W–99L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Leigh Libero
68W–29L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Tammy MacAdams
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Nancy Hawley
97W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Kathryn Hanson
60W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Miyako Kinoshita
95W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Trish Rosa
139W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Betsy Demeyer
33W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dana Manning
36W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Silvia Islam
96W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Cochrane
43W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Elena Kim
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Donnelly
83W–74L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Zupkus
42W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mina Kim
77W–77L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Anderson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.