Teams

SSY:Ad-In Crowd:Rocheleau/Ulmer

2023 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-12vs SSY:Backhanded B's:Conley/HowardWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Bishop / Kristina Carr vs Amy Conley / Katherine Howard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoanne Riley vs Amanda Eckhoff7-6, 3-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Littlejohn / Diana Terranova vs KATHI CUESTA / Melissa DeSchamp4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDanielle Boretti vs Abigail Mariano3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHannah Karpowicz / Maureen Karpowicz vs Alexandra Ford / Carly McFeely6-3, 6-1
2023-07-06Won 41
W#1 DoublesDiana Terranova / Laurie Cutts vs Jennifer Holden / Kaylan Gillespie6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDanielle Boretti vs Sandy Nelson5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristina Carr / Joanne Rocheleau vs Cristin Gillespie / Jill Cooney7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJoanne Riley vs Alissa Merrick6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Littlejohn / Madeline Littlejohn vs Jessica Spagnoli / Kim Leckie7-5, 6-3
2023-06-28vs BBC:Brown Billone:ShanleySplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristina Carr / Diana Terranova vs Stephanie Shanley / Sahar Forghan7-6, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDanielle Boretti vs Jeremy Haskins6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Cloud / Jill Littlejohn vs Teruni Rosengren / Jill Bradley7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHannah Karpowicz vs Sonali Garg6-2, 6-2
2023-06-14vs WOLL:Wollaston:Greeley/BishopWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Bishop / Kristina Carr vs Marcy McGourty / Sarah Merrigan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoanne Riley vs Moria Riordan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Littlejohn / Jody Ulmer vs Lauren Greeley / Jillian Spatola4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDiana Terranova vs Alison Corcoran6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Cloud / Hannah Karpowicz vs Brittany Rist / Brooke Whelan6-1, 6-1
2023-06-07vs SSY:Backhanded B's:Conley/HowardLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristina Carr / Diana Terranova vs Amy Conley / Katherine Howard1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Cutts / Jill Littlejohn vs Melissa DeSchamp / Tisha Petersen0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJoanne Riley vs Abigail Mariano6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Bishop / Jody Ulmer vs KATHI CUESTA / Kristin Sciucco0-6, 1-6
2023-05-31Won 50
W#1 DoublesLisa Bishop / Diana Terranova vs Sandy Nelson / Jennifer Clark6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoanne Riley vs Melissa McCash7-6, 2-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Cutts / Jill Littlejohn vs Kaylan Gillespie / Libby Andrew6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDanielle Boretti vs Jessica Spagnoli6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHannah Karpowicz / Sarah Cloud vs Abigail Cirincione / Cristin Gillespie6-1, 6-1
2023-05-24vs BBC:Brown Billone:ShanleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristina Carr / Diana Terranova vs Teruni Rosengren / Stephanie Shanley6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesHannah Karpowicz vs Jeremy Haskins1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDanielle Boretti vs Sahar Forghan6-1, 6-2
2023-05-10vs WOLL:Wollaston:Greeley/BishopSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristina Carr / Lisa Bishop vs Marcy McGourty / Brooke Whelan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDanielle Boretti vs Lauren Greeley3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoanne Rocheleau / Jill Littlejohn vs Moria Riordan / Kristin Collins7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJody Ulmer / Ellen Petersen vs Jillian Spatola / Sarah Merrigan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBC:Brown Billone:Shanley07132246332
2KIG:Kingsbury:Spagnoli0772856379
3SSY:Backhanded B's:Conley/Howard08261431305
4SSY:Ad-In Crowd:Rocheleau/Ulmer08271332297
5LFW:Longfellow Long Shots:Ackerley08251538304
6WAC:Waltham Blue:Condurso/Cellucci08241639318
7WOLL:Wollaston:Greeley/Bishop08221841348
8STC:Sportsmen's:McKenna/Blacker08231742329
9LFNT:Natick Net Masters:Spetter/Quinlan08152558390
10LFW:Longfellow Green:Buser/Carbutt08122861402
11CED:Cedardale Green:Moore/Cavallini0936931351
12SFT:Spark Blue:Sideman/VanRavestyn09311435334
13BRTC:Bass River:Mastroianni/Porath09242144363
14MAC:Manchester:Cifric/Osterhout09232253402
15CED:Cedardale Servivors:Rugg/Moore09172859421
16IRCC:Indian Ridge Green:Evans/Edelmann09162966478
17SSY:SSYMCA:Nogueira/Rouse010351543366
18MLTC:Love Hurts:Bell/Franzen010311945378
19WESF:Westfit:Warren/Lee010292148415
20WESB:Llamanistas:Nichols/Norman-Clancy010292150427
21SRF:Scituate:Horne010292152413
22WEY:Weymouth Blue:Jenney/Sisk010232755434
23PAX:Tennis Addicts:Heath/Baker010252557459
24CGC:Cohasset Golf Club:Leahy/Norton010222862479
25COH:Cohasset:Eleey/Briggs010203066459
26SHR:'What the Deuce':Stauffer/Eliadis010193167476
27BRCC:Black Rock:Tower010212967463
28NETC:The Sweet Sets:Buyrym/Welcom010173372479

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Diana Terranova
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.83
Kristina Carr
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Danielle Boretti
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.65
Lisa Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Hannah Karpowicz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jill Littlejohn
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Joanne Riley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Joanne Rocheleau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jody Ulmer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laurie Cutts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maureen Karpowicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Cloud
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Carr + Diana Terranova13360% games+2.7% vs expected
Lisa Bishop + Kristina Carr404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Bishop + Diana Terranova404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Bishop + Joanne Rocheleau033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Terranova
32W–6L career · 7 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kristina Carr
22W–9L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Danielle Boretti
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Bishop
16W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Hannah Karpowicz
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Littlejohn
6W–7L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joanne Riley
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joanne Rocheleau
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jody Ulmer
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Cutts
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Karpowicz
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Cloud
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.