Teams

Orange-Folmar

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER-Day · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Folmar / Matthew Turner vs Hunter Davis / Devan Upadhyay3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJavier Colayco vs Sebastian Laguillo1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKenton Keiling / Matthew Kohn vs Dylan Sleszynski / Ivan Rincon6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJason Kinder / Javier Colayco vs Senien Hicks / Dominic Bullano7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEsteban Garcia vs Abraham Torres Pinto6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRyan Plumley / Kenton Keiling vs Dylan Sleszynski / Nick Boye2-6, 1-6
2026-02-15vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Won 32
L#1 DoublesBoris Glamocak / Jason Kinder vs Hunter Davis / Dominic Bullano6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesScott Folmar vs Camilo Moncayo3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Dillman / David Limonta vs Nick Boye / Devan Upadhyay6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMatthew Turner vs Sebastian Laguillo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWil Nguyen / James Nguyen vs Ivan Rincon / Abraham Torres Pinto6-3, 6-2
2026-02-08vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Won 32
L#1 DoublesBrian Dillman / Matthew Turner vs Juan Carlos Rotjes / Sebastian Laguillo6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesScott Folmar vs Devan Upadhyay6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Plumley / Kenton Keiling vs Camilo Moncayo / Senien Hicks1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Kohn vs Hunter Davis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWil Nguyen / James Nguyen vs Celso Percegona Filho / Fabricio Correa7-6, 6-3
2026-01-31vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEsteban Garcia / Brian Dillman vs Hunter Davis / Asher Roddy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWil Nguyen / James Nguyen vs Fabricio Correa / Camilo Moncayo3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesMatthew Kohn vs Nick Boye6-0, 6-0
2026-01-18vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Limonta / Brian Dillman vs Juan Carlos Rotjes / Dominic Bullano6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKenton Keiling / Wil Nguyen vs Mike Messano / Abraham Torres Pinto6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMatthew Turner vs Hunter Davis6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBoris Glamocak / Scott Folmar vs Senien Hicks / Gustavo Castro6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs Sanlando-Phan-The Phantoms 4.5Won 30
W#2 DoublesWil Nguyen / Brian Dillman vs Senien Hicks / Hunter Davis7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPatrick Chang vs Gustavo Castro6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Kohn / Scott Folmar vs Dominic Bullano / Dylan Sleszynski6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Patrick Chang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.25
Matthew Kohn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.24
Jason Kinder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Javier Colayco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.17
Scott Folmar
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.11
Brian Dillman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
David Limonta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Matthew Turner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Esteban Garcia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Kenton Keiling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
James Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Plumley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Dillman + David Limonta213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Chang
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.50
Matthew Kohn
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Jason Kinder
157W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Javier Colayco
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Scott Folmar
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Brian Dillman
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
David Limonta
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Matthew Turner
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Esteban Garcia
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.04
Kenton Keiling
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
James Nguyen
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.71
Ryan Plumley
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.