Teams

HBSQ-Rich

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-19vs WSC-Team Lash 2.5 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKeith Miller / Ryan Buma vs Tom Lash / Sergei Guzun6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Skovron / Sanjay Chopra vs Chris Finger / Marc MacHiz2-6, 0-6
2021-05-30vs WSC-Team Lash 2.5 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesXavier Sherette / Thomas Gilman vs Jim Heale / A C6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaryl Okamura / Darrel Rich vs Tom Lash / Dmitry Zhiyanov6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-15vs WSC-Team Lash 2.5 18+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSanjay Chopra / Corey Lamb vs Miles Ulrich / Geoffrey Buscher6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJustin Popat vs Jesse Chen0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Skovron / Ryan Buma vs Tom Lash / Chris Finger6-7, 1-6
2021-05-08vs WSC-Team Lash 2.5 18+Split 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Gilman / Daryl Okamura vs Geoffrey Buscher / Jesse Chen2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesXavier Sherette / Keith Miller vs Chris Finger / Simon Liepold7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Justin Popat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Sanjay Chopra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.28
Darrel Rich
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.11
Daryl Okamura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.03
Ryan Buma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Keith Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Skovron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Gilman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Gilman + Darrel Rich1835% games−1.1% vs expected
Ryan Buma + Daryl Okamura2537% games−5.9% vs expected
Darrel Rich + Daryl Okamura5251% games−9.8% vs expected
Darrel Rich + Sanjay Chopra2340% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Buma + Sanjay Chopra2350% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Buma + Peter Skovron044 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Gilman + Sanjay Chopra123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Gilman + Daryl Okamura123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Popat
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Sanjay Chopra
30W–39L career · 2 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Darrel Rich
47W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Daryl Okamura
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Ryan Buma
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Keith Miller
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Skovron
0W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Gilman
9W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.