Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.11 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-04vs FLYTE RC CM8.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesTimothy Barlow / Shane Grevin vs Raul Sananes / Elliot Diamond5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStefan Serbicki / Daniel Johnson vs Joe Gulash / Thomas Schmidt6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSong Bai / Steven Colletto vs Olivier Picault / Micha Berman2-6, 2-6
2025-09-20vs FLYTE RC CM8.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesJake Lam / Jamin Ruark vs Elliot Diamond / Raul Sananes6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTom Kincaid / Bryan Arbios vs Olivier Jorda / Olivier Picault6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrett Wilmes / Max Luedecke vs Chris Neal / John Huster3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Jake Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Cory Fulchiron
published 4.5
4.26
Timothy Barlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Max Luedecke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Tom Veach
published
4.16
Steven Colletto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Brett Wilmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Jamin Ruark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Jady Palko
published 4
3.93
Tom Kincaid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Daniel Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Shane Grevin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Ian Hannah
published 4
3.81
Bryan Arbios
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Sean Steenburgh
published
Andrew Johnston
published 4
3.65
Song Bai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stefan Serbicki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jake Lam
22W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%44%
4.48
4.5
Cory Fulchiron
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
Timothy Barlow
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
4.26
Max Luedecke
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Tom Veach
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
Steven Colletto
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Brett Wilmes
24W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Jamin Ruark
21W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Jady Palko
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Tom Kincaid
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Daniel Johnson
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Shane Grevin
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Ian Hannah
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Bryan Arbios
7W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Sean Steenburgh
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Andrew Johnston
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Song Bai
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Stefan Serbicki
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.