Teams

GEPTA-6.0-MX-55(Lunghi)(EPTC#2)

2022 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE · 6.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-19vs GEPTA-6.0-MX-55(Ferris)(TW)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatricia Moye Holderman / Antonio Marquez vs Michele Zerah / Ruben Martinez6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Beckles / Pat Rodriguez vs Veronica Gonzalez / Jorge Kareh4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCristina da Costa / Manouchehr Refaeian vs Lorena Reynolds / Michael Ferris6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-18vs GEPTA-6.0-MX-55(Ferris)(TW)Won 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Beckles / Arvind Singhal vs Craig Fortune / Veronica Gonzalez7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCristina da Costa / James Lambeth vs Patricia Jacobes / Stephen Schlett6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiane Lunghi / Robert Burns vs Ruben Martinez / Robin May7-5, 6-2
2022-10-22vs GEPTA-6.0-MX-55(Ferris)(TW)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Burns / Diane Lunghi vs Jorge Kareh / Sara Blanco6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHector Mendoza / Esther Orona vs Craig Fortune / Veronica Gonzalez4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Beckles / Pat Rodriguez vs Michele Zerah / Richard Salazar6-1, 6-2
2022-09-24vs GEPTA-6.0-MX-55(Ferris)(TW)Won 21
L#1 DoublesCristina da Costa / James Lambeth vs Patricia Jacobes / Ruben Martinez2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDina Schlotterbeck / Arvind Singhal vs Sara Blanco / Craig Fortune6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEsther Orona / Hector Mendoza vs Vera Ray / Roberto Molina6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Arvind Singhal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Diane Lunghi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Esther Orona
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
James Lambeth
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Antonio Marquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Dina Schlotterbeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
James McCleland
published 3
2.68
Cristina da Costa
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.19
Hector Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pat Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Moye Holderman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Burns
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Rosario Mendoza
published
Stephanie Beckles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Lunghi + Robert Burns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arvind Singhal
57W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Diane Lunghi
136W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Esther Orona
115W–106L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
James Lambeth
108W–107L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Antonio Marquez
31W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Dina Schlotterbeck
62W–81L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
James McCleland
80W–75L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Hector Mendoza
24W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Manouchehr Refaeian
109W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pat Rodriguez
41W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman
66W–54L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Burns
61W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosario Mendoza
34W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Beckles
71W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.