← TeamsPL-Tightly Strung-Graham
2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON
Scouting
Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
3.12
Rajesh Gattiusually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2019-03-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Blasko / Rajesh Gatti vs Michael Nolan / Nigam Shah2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-03-02Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Blasko / Rajesh Gatti vs Terry Lundeen / Chris Nelson6-4, 6-4
2019-02-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRajesh Gatti / Mohan Varthakavi vs Edward Hocker / Doni Wanat3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-01-26Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMohan Varthakavi / Rajesh Gatti vs Puru Masuli / Raman Batish6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2019-01-18Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesRajesh Gatti vs Brian Flynn6-3, 6-2
2019-01-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Blasko / Rajesh Gatti vs Tony Shaheen / Sat Mohan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2019-01-06Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRajesh Gatti / David Graham vs Robert Sidbury / Douglas Pearson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.