Teams

Bruner, Katherine

2021 Adult 40 & Over Daytime League 3.0 - 4.5 · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-23vs Madison, RaquelSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBeth Madden / Allison Waters vs Raquel Madison / Michelle Anderson3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Hart vs Ruth Ospino6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Hellen / Sara Schibig vs Angel Krishna / Kim Chappelow-Lee6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Metz / Maria Moore vs Susan Hansen / Sheila Goins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-16vs Peck, MandyLost 13
L#1 DoublesKatherine Bruner / Jane Metz vs Mandy Peck / Jacque Griffey2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJanice Redlingshafer vs Rhonda Bonner3-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesAmy McCarthy / Tiffany Hellen vs Brooke Indiveri / Becky Mehrmann4-6, 5-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Hart / Allison Waters vs Betsy Triplett / Keri Evans5-7, 5-5, 0-1
2021-04-09vs Luchinsky, KarenWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Chisholm / Annie Houlehan vs June Kim / Carolyn Ellspermann6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Hart vs Dina Mitchell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Hellen / Maria Moore vs Candace Asbell / Sara Lester5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-26vs Johnson, HeatherSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Zogleman / Annie Houlehan vs Gina Sutton / Chan Townsend5-7, 5-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Chisholm / Beth Madden vs Tammy Jordan / Kris Townsend6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2021-03-12vs Lovinggood, MarlaWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Zogleman / Annie Houlehan vs Lori Breshears / Jodi Wilson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Hart vs Gayle Osborne5-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Moore / Jane Metz vs Ruth Knox / Meg Townsend2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Bruner / Kelly Wright vs Marla Lovinggood / Christine Schwermann5-7, 5-2, 1-0
2021-02-26vs HOA/Holsinger/40&Over4.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Bruner / Laura Chisholm vs Jody Holsinger / Julie Kehrwald4-6, 5-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Hart vs Susan Doerr2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Zogleman / Beth Madden vs Tamara Hutcheson / Jenny Arbanas6-4, 6-4
2021-02-19vs Roberts, TiffanyWon 31
W#1 DoublesKatherine Bruner / Laura Chisholm vs Alisa McNeill / Barbi Richards6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesErin Gustafson vs Lauren Johnson6-1, 4-1
L#2 DoublesAmy McCarthy / Jane Metz vs Tiffany Roberts / Karen Kopulos3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnnie Houlehan / Beth Madden vs Christy Gudenkauf / Deon Rasmuson6-0, 6-2
2021-02-12vs Wedel, NancyWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Gustafson / Beth Madden vs Tasha Evatt / Nancy Wedel6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJanice Redlingshafer vs Maki True6-2, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Bruner / Laura Chisholm vs Betsy Norberg / Loras Heck6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Amy Zogleman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.37
Erin Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
Annie Houlehan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.83
Janice Redlingshafer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.79
Laura Chisholm
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.79
Tiffany Hellen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Amy Hart
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Bruner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Allison Waters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.16
Maria Moore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Beth Madden
published
Jane Metz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Houlehan + Amy Zogleman7366% games+8.9% vs expected
Laura Chisholm + Annie Houlehan5171% games+3.3% vs expected
Tiffany Hellen + Laura Chisholm14461% games+1.4% vs expected
Laura Chisholm + Katherine Bruner191054% games+0.4% vs expected
Jane Metz + Katherine Bruner7253% games+0.2% vs expected
Jane Metz + Maria Moore2542% games−5.2% vs expected
Amy Hart + Janice Redlingshafer6454% games−9.3% vs expected
Katherine Bruner + Maria Moore2546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amy Zogleman
134W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
4.44
4.5
Erin Gustafson
103W–39L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Annie Houlehan
80W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janice Redlingshafer
56W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
Laura Chisholm
98W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
Tiffany Hellen
78W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Amy Hart
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katherine Bruner
127W–73L career · 5 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Allison Waters
39W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
Maria Moore
63W–114L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Beth Madden
14W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jane Metz
22W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.