Teams

Sawyer 2024

2024 Singles League 18&over-NE · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-06vs Corinth/FulghumWon 21
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Barnitz vs Susan Hand-Pina6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Keli Ballard6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAnn Hazel vs Ashleigh Dalton5-7, 6-7
2024-10-28vs Clinic Peeps 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Barnitz vs Kayla Reynolds6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Carleigh Melton6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLibby Carruth vs Corrie Weatherford6-3, 7-6
2024-10-24vs Corinth/FulghumWon 20
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Barnitz vs Susan Hand-Pina6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Kristie Studdard6-1, 6-2
2024-10-21vs Brooke BurlesonWon 20
W#1 SinglesPerrish Dragovits vs Jessica Rushing6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Kara Penny6-0, 6-0
2024-10-16vs Clinic Peeps 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Samantha Weatherford4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Joy Whittle6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAnn Hazel vs Shannon Chrisman7-5, 6-1
2024-10-14vs Brooke BurlesonWon 30
W#1 SinglesPerrish Dragovits vs Kara Penny6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Brooke Burleson6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Jessica Rushing6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Ashton Scarborough
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Elizabeth Barnitz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Ann Hazel
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.62
Perrish Dragovits
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Alicia Milstead
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Ajah Sawyer
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Libby Carruth
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Milstead + Perrish Dragovits2347% games+0.9% vs expected
Ajah Sawyer + Ashton Scarborough314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashton Scarborough
62W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Elizabeth Barnitz
43W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Ann Hazel
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Perrish Dragovits
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Alicia Milstead
34W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Ajah Sawyer
19W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Libby Carruth
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.