← Teams

IRV-Townsend/Crothers

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Heather Matteri
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.20
Julia Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Wendy Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.81
Deborah Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Ashley Bevan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Megan Ullmann
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAnita Palodichuk / Wendy Schmidt vs SHAWNA THOMPSON / Jenell Henson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeborah Cohen vs Fatemeh Carter1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Ullmann / Ashley Bevan vs Melanie DeSilva / Ivy Lane6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Heather Matteri vs Bethanie DeRoux / Linh Tran6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Ullmann / Tanya Doubleday vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-21Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Leslie Sampson vs Lisa Hockman / Catherine Huang6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLaurel Hallock Koppelman vs Erin Canova6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDenise Townsend / Megan Ullmann vs Jennifer Tobin / Alice Holland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Wendy Schmidt vs Dory Simons / Rachel Young6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Matteri / Leslie Sampson vs Amy Risch / Christine Bennett-Hanes6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Ashley Bevan vs Jennifer Stevenson / Madeleine Bourland4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-06Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesLaurel Hallock Koppelman vs Suki Birge7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSarie Crothers / Heather Matteri vs Penny Luong / Yukiko Namba6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Tanya Doubleday vs Manisha Thakkar / Rosalie Trevejo4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-29Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLeslie Sampson / Julia Plowman vs Jennifer Stevenson / Desiree Bliss6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather Matteri / Laurel Hallock Koppelman vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Julie Kafoury6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Ullmann / Kathy Cooke vs Meagan Lake / Sarah Bracelin6-2, 6-2
2023-04-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Wendy Schmidt vs Kara Petracca / Adriana McCord7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Matteri / Ashley Bevan vs Jerin Boyer / Jill Boyer-Quick6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Tanya Doubleday vs Wendy Vail / Becki Garrow7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-08Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Leslie Sampson vs Kendra Rothert / Jane King Ayers6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Heather Matteri vs Dipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather Matteri
58W–30L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
6%94%1%
3.20
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
26%74%0%
3.06
3
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
74W–75L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Deborah Cohen
65W–38L career
0%99%1%
2.81
3
Ashley Bevan
36W–28L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
Megan Ullmann
20W–15L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.