Teams

SC-Bowton-Deife

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 WOMEN

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-07vs PC-LandefeldLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarlaine Moore / Elaine Kelley vs Naticia Litven / Elizabeth Nott6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKari Bowton / Jayne Deife vs Monique Eldridge / Michi VanGrunsven6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Dix / Sheryl Traum vs Sandra Andrews / Jodi Landefeld0-6, 0-6
2021-11-06vs PC-LandefeldLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheryl Traum / Kathleen Dix vs Monique Eldridge / Michi VanGrunsven1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarlaine Moore / Jayne Deife vs Jodi Landefeld / Julie Scott4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElaine Kelley / Kari Bowton vs Elizabeth Nott / Naticia Litven6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-11-06vs YTC-MorrisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheryl Traum / Kathleen Dix vs Jo Ann Kurz / Pamela Alexander1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarlaine Moore / Jayne Deife vs Kathleen Goyette / Maureen Strieb2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Kelley / Kari Bowton vs Kathy Brashear / Debby Jones6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-11-05vs YTC-MorrisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Bowton / Jayne Deife vs Jo Ann Kurz / Pamela Alexander0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarlaine Moore / Kathleen Dix vs Kathy Brashear / Debby Jones0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Kelley / Sheryl Traum vs Susan Morrison / Kathleen Goyette4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC-Bowton-Deife0421022133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Marlaine Moore
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Kari Bowton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.70
Elaine Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jayne Deife
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sheryl Traum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marlaine Moore + Elaine Kelley142249% games+0.7% vs expected
Elaine Kelley + Kari Bowton1544% games−1.9% vs expected
Marlaine Moore + Jayne Deife1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marlaine Moore
43W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Kari Bowton
37W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.94
4.5
Elaine Kelley
47W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.70
Jayne Deife
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheryl Traum
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.