Teams

San Jose - Cumbow

2026 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-07vs Julington Creek - BowmanWon 20
W#3 DoublesDerek Kettel / Thomas Hack vs Jesse Wells / Alan Belcher6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesWilliam Langley / Richard Scott vs Forrest Gibson / Derek Smith6-3, 6-4
2026-02-28vs FYC - WilliamsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Langley / Richard Scott vs Kenneth Watson / Clark Green2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Oliver / Thomas Hack vs John Williams / JD Reeder7-6, 6-2
2026-02-21Won 10
W#4 DoublesMichael Zambetti / Richard Scott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-07vs Duval/FrickeLost 14
L#1 DoublesKenneth Brannon / Timothy Hedrick vs Chuck King / Andy Fricke4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Rafferty vs Richard Hull3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Scott / Michael Zambetti vs Praveen Nair / Young Lee2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Valent / Johnthomas Cumbow vs Robert Phillips / Rory Sparrow6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesThomas Hack / William Langley vs Mike Mulvey / Mark Cabler4-6, 1-6
2026-01-31vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 20
W#2 DoublesKenneth Brannon / William Langley vs Frank Wilson / Gene Greiner6-4, 6-4
W#4 DoublesRichard Scott / Michael Zambetti vs Bruce King / Thomas Edgeworth7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-24vs Boone - HemphillLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrent Latour / Kevin Valent vs Eddie Kiep / Luca Palombi6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChris Oliver vs Alexander Fetner6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKenneth Brannon / Thomas Hack vs Paul Asuncion / Derek Hyatt3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Hedrick / William Langley vs John Comiskey / Peter Hunt6-7, 6-7
W#4 DoublesRichard Scott / Michael Zambetti vs Tony Camarce / Derek Copeland6-2, 6-2
2026-01-17vs Eagle Harbor - WilliamsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAbe Dopazo / William Langley vs Michael Rouse / Mike Bruno1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTimothy Hedrick / Kenneth Brannon vs Jim Pinkerman / David Phillips6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Chris Oliver
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Kevin Valent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Ryan Rafferty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Brent Latour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Kenneth Brannon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Derek Kettel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Jason Rice
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
3.20
Johnthomas Cumbow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Timothy Hedrick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Michael Siebenhaar
published
3.15
Phillip Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
William Langley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Brooks Mccormick
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.11
Richard Scott
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.09
Thomas Hack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Abe Dopazo
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phillip Garcia + Jason Rice9171% games+9.9% vs expected
Kevin Valent + Jason Rice6264% games+5.0% vs expected
William Langley + Richard Scott2538% games−9.7% vs expected
William Langley + Kenneth Brannon314 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Brannon + Chris Oliver314 matchesnot enough data
Johnthomas Cumbow + Kevin Valent314 matchesnot enough data
Richard Scott + Jason Rice123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Brannon + Jason Rice123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Oliver
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Kevin Valent
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Ryan Rafferty
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Brent Latour
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Kenneth Brannon
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Derek Kettel
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jason Rice
28W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Johnthomas Cumbow
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Timothy Hedrick
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Michael Siebenhaar
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Phillip Garcia
17W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
William Langley
12W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Brooks Mccormick
12W–0L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
Richard Scott
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Thomas Hack
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Abe Dopazo
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.