Teams

TAmos/PTrantham (WSRC)

2025 Adult Other 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 2.5 Women - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-05vs MWilliams/LSupernavage (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristina Campbell / Laurie Madonna vs Marie Foley / Crissa Klein6-4, 6-3
2025-04-28vs RJampani (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTracy Amos / Pamela Trantham vs Diane DeMus / Alia Nassri7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristina Campbell / Laurie Madonna vs Brooke Malley / Betsy Sprenger6-3, 6-0
2025-04-21vs GKosowitz (FCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatrina Gustafson / Pamela Trantham vs Golin Kosowitz / Laura Carpinelli6-2, 6-3
2025-04-14vs DCallinan/CRowe (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Trantham / Kristina Campbell vs Crystal Rowe / Erica Testerman6-0, 6-1
2025-03-31vs MWilliams/LSupernavage (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Amos / Laurie Madonna vs Marie Foley / Crissa Klein4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Kuperman / Pamela Trantham vs Dara Rickles / Julia Kirby6-3, 7-6
2025-03-24vs RJampani (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Trantham / Kristina Campbell vs Radhika Jampani / Anne Talmage6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaurie Madonna / Jennifer Cooper Terada vs Kinnera Angadi / Purnima Kunwor4-6, 3-6
2025-03-20vs DCallinan/CRowe (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlisa Hood / Laurie Madonna vs Christina Hall / Melissa Orr6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-17vs GKosowitz (FCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Madonna / Kristina Campbell vs Carrie Oliphant / Laura Carpinelli6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 2.5 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Kristina Campbell
published
2.60
Laurie Madonna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.52
Pamela Trantham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.35
Samantha Holcman
published
2.29
Tracy Amos
published
2.10
Nancy Pratt
published
2.02
2.00
Alisa Hood
published 2.5
Jessica Kuperman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Trantham + Laurie Madonna4945% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Campbell
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
2.5
Laurie Madonna
89W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
2.5
Pamela Trantham
64W–76L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.52
Samantha Holcman
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Tracy Amos
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Nancy Pratt
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jennifer Cooper Terada
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Alisa Hood
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Jessica Kuperman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.