Teams

Fee Gold of Cortez

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over NA - Brevard Men's Tnns League · 4.0-5.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-03vs Fee RatsWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesJames Knepper / Jim Peterson vs Daniel Flores / Trey Crowley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-19vs EFSC The Wild WestmorelandsWon 30
W#1 Male DoublesRicardo Cortez / James Knepper vs Rohan Ramdeholl / Patrick McGuigan6-4, 6-3
W#1 Male SinglesNico San Nicolas vs Nathan Hartnett6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 Male DoublesJustin Hertzog / Alec Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-19vs Rockledge Ol' Timers+Won 21
W#1 Male DoublesJames Knepper / Alec Nguyen vs Leonardo DaSilva / Douglas Nelson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 Male SinglesNico San Nicolas vs Patrick Killeavy0-6, 0-6
W#2 Male DoublesJustin Hertzog / Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair vs Toney McIntosh / Norman Hosan7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-12vs Fee RatsLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesJames Knepper / Jim Peterson vs Daniel Flores / Jacob Kargauer1-6, 1-6
2026-02-12vs Rockledge RockersLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesJames Knepper / Jim Peterson vs Angel Alayon / Andy McConnell3-6, 2-6
L#2 Male DoublesRicardo Cortez / Gregory Whitaker vs Shawn Coleman / Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues3-6, 4-6
2026-02-05vs EFSC The Wild WestmorelandsLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesRicardo Cortez / Nico San Nicolas vs Nathan Hartnett / Patrick McGuigan3-6, 0-6
2026-01-29vs Desoto Kevin's LackeysSplit 11
W#1 Male SinglesNico San Nicolas vs Isidro Zavaleta6-1, 6-3
L#2 Male DoublesRicardo Cortez / Justin Hertzog vs Kyle Hine / Jean Arnaud1-6, 1-6
2026-01-15vs Rockledge Ol' Timers+Lost 01
L#1 Male DoublesJames Knepper / Jim Peterson vs Casey Coffey / Leonardo DaSilva6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-08vs Fee RatsSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesJames Knepper / Jim Peterson vs Jacob Kargauer / Kenneth Moore6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 Male SinglesNico San Nicolas vs Trey Crowley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0-5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Jim Peterson
published
3.98
James Knepper
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Alec Nguyen
published 4
3.83
Nico San Nicolas
usually #1 Male Singles 80%, also #2 Male Doubles 20% · published
3.74
Justin Hertzog
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Ricardo Cortez
usually #2 Male Doubles 75%, also #1 Male Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Peterson
17W–4L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
James Knepper
40W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Alec Nguyen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Nico San Nicolas
42W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Justin Hertzog
32W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Jyothishkumar Unnikrishnan Nair
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Ricardo Cortez
24W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.