Teams

S OR-ATFC-Smith

2023 MIXED 18 & Over · 9.0 MIXED DOUBLES

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-09vs ESTC-Haworth-LiuWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Hobbs / Heather Bartlett vs Ethan Smith / Anna Frazer2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDana Smith / John Dix vs Cory Stores / Elise Crum6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Brown / Cian O'Neil vs Geoff Smith / Janae Smith7-6, 6-2
2022-10-09vs ACB-AndersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Brown / Cian O'Neil vs Anna Kitson / Alex Helm6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDana Smith / Robert Hobbs vs Rachel Montagne / James Page5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMckenzie Hilmer / Jason Roberts vs Kathleen Stevens / Tyler Fix6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-08vs ACB-AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Hobbs / Dana Smith vs Kathleen Stevens / Eric Rutherford6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCian O'Neil / Jennifer Brown vs Rachel Montagne / James Page7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMckenzie Hilmer / Jason Roberts vs Caitlin Carr / James Jordan6-2, 6-1
2022-10-08vs ESTC-Haworth-LiuWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Dix / Dana Smith vs Brandon Montagna / Anna Frazer6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJason Roberts / Mckenzie Hilmer vs Sian Haworth-Liu / Preston Martin5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Hobbs / Heather Bartlett vs Geoff Smith / Janae Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 MIXED DOUBLES
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-ATFC-Smith317512112
2ACB-Anderson226615115
3ESTC-Haworth-Liu135716119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dana Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
John Dix
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Cian O'Neil
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Heather Bartlett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jason Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mckenzie Hilmer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Smith + John Dix5552% gamesnot enough data
Dana Smith + Robert Hobbs134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Smith + Cian O'Neil213 matchesnot enough data
Mckenzie Hilmer + Jason Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Smith
30W–26L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
John Dix
32W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Cian O'Neil
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.14
Heather Bartlett
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Roberts
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mckenzie Hilmer
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Hobbs
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.