Teams

CAC Chawla - Dream Team

2024 Lynchburg Combo Mixed · Lynchburg Combo Mixed 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesRachel Love / Chad Rakos vs Federico Holgado / Kelly Knight6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJesse Naples / Grace Petty vs Jessica Hughes / Ronald Watson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMoki Chawla / Allison Rakos vs Larry Bell / Dawn Fraser6-0, 7-6
2024-12-08vs CAC Hoover - Tenacious TennisWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Love / Chad Rakos vs Emily Casper-Brown / Scott Englund6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJesse Naples / Grace Petty vs Jennifer Smith Ramey / Raciel Alonso0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEmily Evans / Jorshe Joseph vs Michael Hoover / Lisa Hoover6-1, 6-0
2024-11-23vs BCC JesterWon 21
L#1 DoublesAllison Rakos / Chad Rakos vs Stacey Basten / Scott Rainey2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanika Carey / Jesse Naples vs Margaret Keller / Gary Sibcy6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Evans / Jorshe Joseph vs Denise Eubank / Royston Jester6-2, 6-0
2024-11-17vs CAC Hoover - Tenacious TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJesse Naples / Janika Carey vs Forrest Bryant / Jennifer Smith Ramey2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJorshe Joseph / Emily Evans vs Raciel Alonso / Anna Aldridge6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChristopher Burriss / Grace Petty vs Scott Englund / Emily Casper-Brown6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-09vs BCC JesterWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanika Carey / Jesse Naples vs Gary Sibcy / Lory Sibcy7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Burriss / Emily Evans vs William Eubank / Denise Eubank6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChad Rakos / Allison Rakos vs Scott Rainey / Melody Glenn6-2, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMoki Chawla / Elizabeth Bogle vs Stuart Tinsley / Kate Tinsley7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Love / Jorshe Joseph vs Peter Sackett / Jessica Hughes5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Burriss / Janika Carey vs Larry Bell / Dawn Fraser6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMoki Chawla / Elizabeth Bogle vs Stuart Tinsley / Kate Tinsley6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJorshe Joseph / Grace Petty vs Federico Holgado / Kelly Knight2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Rakos / Chad Rakos vs Larry Bell / Dawn Fraser6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-19vs CAC Hoover - Tenacious TennisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMoki Chawla / Elizabeth Bogle vs Raciel Alonso / Jennifer Smith Ramey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJesse Naples / Janika Carey vs Charlie Durie / Kendra Turner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Love / Jorshe Joseph vs Michael Hoover / Anna Aldridge6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-13vs BCC JesterWon 30
W#1 DoublesChad Rakos / Rachel Love vs Jacob Sibcy / Margaret Keller7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMoki Chawla / Allison Rakos vs Scott Rainey / Whitney Perrow6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristopher Burriss / Emily Evans vs Erich Maier / Melody Glenn6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Emily Evans
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.90
Grace Petty
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Janika Carey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Rachel Love
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.80
Allison Rakos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Moki Chawla
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
Elizabeth Bogle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chad Rakos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Christopher Burriss
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jesse Naples
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jorshe Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesse Naples + Janika Carey4351% gamesnot enough data
Chad Rakos + Allison Rakos3348% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bogle + Moki Chawla3256% gamesnot enough data
Chad Rakos + Rachel Love303 matchesnot enough data
Chad Rakos + Emily Evans303 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Love + Moki Chawla123 matchesnot enough data
Moki Chawla + Allison Rakos213 matchesnot enough data
Jorshe Joseph + Emily Evans303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Evans
22W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.06
Grace Petty
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Janika Carey
19W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Rachel Love
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Allison Rakos
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Moki Chawla
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Elizabeth Bogle
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Chad Rakos
11W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Burriss
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jesse Naples
12W–15L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jorshe Joseph
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.