Teams

CDTA E 18&OW3.0 9MTP Dluzen Sat 4 $27

CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesTara Snow / Kristin Lordahl vs Carine Petrovic / Daione Mitchell4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStefanie Zirkelbach vs Neli Alexieva2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDEBORAH LEMONIDIS / Judy Dluzen vs Sandra Holl / Mary Chang0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCherrie Han / Gabrielle Esposito vs ELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Monika Thadhani6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Judy Dluzen vs Leena Bhat / Beth Horowitz Steel0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDEBORAH LEMONIDIS / Laurie Pereira vs CHRISTINE TAN / Frances Hopps1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesCherrie Han / Judy Dluzen vs Modupe Sobo / Marta Kaminska2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Teresa Simchak3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / DEBORAH LEMONIDIS vs Midge Mountin / Lori Lamey1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesTara Snow / Cherrie Han vs Michelle Yeh / Lelia Lanuza1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Lordahl vs Hannah Williams4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Dluzen / Laurie Pereira vs Nora Jewett / Joanna Taft0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesHolly Cooper-Belconis / Kelleen Thut vs Shelly Costabile / Sheila Henretta2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTara Snow vs Emma Lee1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Kristin Lordahl vs Julie Gordon / Karen Kos1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDEBORAH LEMONIDIS / Judy Dluzen vs Amanda Marijanovic / Amy Shappert2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / Cherrie Han vs Lisa Betts / Jenni Pencyla6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesStefanie Zirkelbach vs Krista Tartoni6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJudy Dluzen / Beverly Vacval vs Kim Novak / Caron Williams5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · CDTA E 18&O Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&OW3.0 10Life Kiernan Sun 4 $2781251127258
2CDTA E 18&OW3.0 6RCLB Sherman Sun 4 $2263221432269
3CDTA E 18&OW3.0 5Cent Cohen Sun 3 $2063211535300
4CDTA E 18&OW3.0 4Tam Wolff Sun 3 $2263191737275
5CDTA E 18&OW3.0 7Cent Tromp Sun 7 $2054221431249
6CDTA E 18&OW3.0 2MTC Brown1 Sun 2 $33.554211534283
7CDTA E 18&OW3.0 8MTB Gordon Sun 12 $2745201638295
8CDTA E 18&OW3.0 1XS Charles Sun 3 $2545152145311
9CDTA E 18&OW3.0 3MTC Brown2 Sun 2 $33.518122453351
10CDTA E 18&OW3.0 9MTP Dluzen Sat 4 $270933366412

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Stefanie Zirkelbach
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Kristin Lordahl
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Tara Snow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Cherrie Han
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kelleen Thut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Holly Cooper-Belconis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Gabrielle Esposito
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Beverly Vacval
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Judy Dluzen
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.12
DEBORAH LEMONIDIS
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Laurie Pereira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherrie Han + Stefanie Zirkelbach7166% games+14.3% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Tara Snow2641% games+0.3% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Gabrielle Esposito3540% games−4.6% vs expected
DEBORAH LEMONIDIS + Judy Dluzen31434% games−7.6% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Beverly Vacval4255% gamesnot enough data
Gabrielle Esposito + Beverly Vacval2442% gamesnot enough data
Judy Dluzen + Beverly Vacval0624% gamesnot enough data
Kelleen Thut + Cherrie Han1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stefanie Zirkelbach
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kristin Lordahl
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Tara Snow
33W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Cherrie Han
74W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kelleen Thut
65W–104L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Holly Cooper-Belconis
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Gabrielle Esposito
13W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Beverly Vacval
40W–107L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Judy Dluzen
16W–61L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
DEBORAH LEMONIDIS
6W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laurie Pereira
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.