Teams

EPatulski-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Eve

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 6:30 PM
Ephesus Park Tennis Courts
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Ephesus Park Tennis Courts
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
Oct 8 8:00 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
2026-09-01vs MMcCullough-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesKhelsey Lemon / Hannah Gahagan vs Susan Kim / Courtney Van Houtven6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAreli Grodski / Susanne Schmal vs Sarah Johnston / Amanda Klein6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Latson / Ni Zhang vs Abi Raja / Athena Samaras0-6, 2-6
2026-08-23vs MMcCullough-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Helms / Areli Grodski vs Megan McCullough / Amanda Laird6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSophia Ewing / Hannah Gahagan vs Courtney Van Houtven / Virginia Wang6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKhelsey Lemon / Lauren Kane vs Sarah Johnston / Athena Samaras6-4, 6-4
2026-08-20vs ABoone-TOCHWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Katie Helms vs Dana Crotts / Meredith Bazemore6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNi Zhang / Ruitian Yan vs Hanna Porter / Kait Mckee6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKellie Johnson / Susanne Schmal vs Ashleigh White / Holly Baker6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Sophia Ewing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Hannah Gahagan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Katie Helms
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Kellie Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Ruitian Yan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Emily Patulski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.55
Areli Grodski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.53
Susanne Schmal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Khelsey Lemon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.38
Lauren Kane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Rachel Latson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Ni Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Gahagan + Ruitian Yan213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Helms + Emily Patulski303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Helms + Areli Grodski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Ewing
24W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%1%99%
2.82
Hannah Gahagan
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Katie Helms
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Kellie Johnson
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
Ruitian Yan
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
2.5
Emily Patulski
39W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
2.5
Areli Grodski
45W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%35%65%
2.55
2.5
Susanne Schmal
60W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.53
2.5
Khelsey Lemon
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Lauren Kane
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Rachel Latson
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Ni Zhang
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.