← Teams

SHC-Collier

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Linda Mertz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Maureen Mader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Kathleen Francis
published 3
Results8 ties
2022-05-26Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Hellen-Halfen / Maureen Mader vs Kaki Brenneman / Peg McClendon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-06Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Hellen-Halfen / Maureen Mader vs Louanne Fuller / Nancy Duncan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-22Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesMaureen Mader / Elisabeth Hellen-Halfen vs Holly Guntermann / Linda Underwood6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Noriko Dozono vs Tuni Stecker / Shirley Derby6-4, 6-4
2022-04-15Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Hellen-Halfen / Maureen Mader vs Charleen Straub / Pam Freier6-3, 6-1
2022-04-08Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Sue Easton vs Barbara Pasmore / Holly Guntermann6-2, 6-3
2022-04-01Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJanet Collier / Maureen Mader vs Laura Greenberg / Shelley Laurance7-5, 7-6
2022-03-25Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Kathy Siebers vs Kristin Vandehey / Susie Garland7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-18Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Hellen-Halfen / Maureen Mader vs Cathy Zagunis / Merry Pettis7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Maureen Mader
20W–12L career
not enough data
—
3
Kathleen Francis
16W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.