Teams

ROLLING HILLS 18AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Erin Feely
published 4.5
3.97
Joanna Frazier
published
3.94
Holly Woolard
published 4
3.91
Mira Schwirtz
published
3.87
Liz Hartmann
published
3.85
Anusuya Mokashi
published 4
3.78
Ana Dougherty
published 4
Catherine Diego
published 4
3.74
3.70
Martina Hamamjian
published
3.65
Miriam Sittenfeld
published
3.62
Lisa Spencer
published
3.54
Mary Gamble
published
3.48
Kathy Halligan
published
3.43
Stacey Clemenceau
published
3.16
Tricia Hulsey
published 3.5
Quynh Pearson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Frazier + Annie van Den Toorn4161% games+6.7% vs expected
Mary Gamble + Joanna Frazier224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Gamble + Kathy Halligan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Feely
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
Joanna Frazier
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Holly Woolard
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mira Schwirtz
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Liz Hartmann
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Anusuya Mokashi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Ana Dougherty
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Catherine Diego
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Annie van Den Toorn
25W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Martina Hamamjian
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Miriam Sittenfeld
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Lisa Spencer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathy Halligan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Stacey Clemenceau
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Tricia Hulsey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Quynh Pearson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.