Teams

Keswick-Merrick

2024 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wallace / Janet Silvester vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Forest Lakes-SanfordLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Sharon Merrick vs Mary Manley / Maggie Leary2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-16vs BHSC 1-RyanLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Tracy / Sharon Merrick vs Lauren Dunn / Kelly Lindauer1-6, 0-6
2024-10-10vs Double Trouble-JorgensenLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanet Silvester / Lynn Serpico vs Elizabeth Gunnels / Susan Cabell Mains4-6, 3-6
2024-10-02vs Glenmore-LongLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Merrick / Mariana Bell vs Kathleen Long / Catherine Haney0-6, 4-6
2024-09-28vs Forest Lakes-SanfordLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Tracy / Janet Silvester vs Lynette Sanford / Mary Manley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMariana Bell / Sharon Merrick vs Terry Roberts / Christine Eagleson2-6, 0-6
2024-09-11vs ACAC-SimonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariana Bell / Sharon Merrick vs Lori Gagnon / Martha Donnelly4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Maggie Moore
published
3.27
Laura Leetzow
published
3.15
Megan Wyant
published
2.87
Mariana Bell
published
2.84
2.83
Gillian Grant
published
2.82
Susan Tracy
published
2.73
Elizabeth Boylan
published
2.41
Janet Silvester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.31
Amelia Black
published 3
2.31
Sharon Merrick
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Perdue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Silvester + Sharon Merrick2938% gamesnot enough data
Amelia Black + Janet Silvester033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Laura Leetzow
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Megan Wyant
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Mariana Bell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Catherine Wallace
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Gillian Grant
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Susan Tracy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Elizabeth Boylan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Janet Silvester
30W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.41
3
Amelia Black
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.31
2.5
Sharon Merrick
31W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
Elizabeth Perdue
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.