Teams

B5 Raintree Stahling

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-15vs B7 Southampton BrownLost 02
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Deena Kretzer5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Boschen / Alexis Bullard vs Margaret Duke / Beth Morris3-6, 4-6
2021-08-08vs B8 Burkwood ClarkWon 20
W#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Mary Spagnolo6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Barbara Portanova vs Carolyn Shute / Karen Cole6-1, 6-2
2021-07-24vs B1 ACAC NeumannWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Boschen / Julie Scott vs Margaret Peters / Donna Barrett6-0, 6-1
2021-07-22vs B6 MRTC Hawley Battery Park 3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Valerie Caldwell vs Carolyn Hawley / Jessica Stephens4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Shelly Galles2-6, 0-6
2021-06-26vs B7 Southampton BrownLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Alice McCollum1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-19vs B8 Burkwood ClarkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesValerie Caldwell / Carolyn Moncure vs Modestine Carter / Virginia Bowie2-6, 3-5
W#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Bridget Cease7-5, 4-1
2021-06-12vs B4 SCC Sal’s Berries TornabeneWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Caldwell / Carolyn Moncure vs Jessica Steinour / Nancy Sullivan6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Carolyn Moncure
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Corrine Cooper
published 3.5
3.10
Shannon Webb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
3.00
Christine Martine
published 3.5
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
2.86
Pam Koch
published
Anne Sansom
published 3
2.72
Alexis Bullard
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Webb + Carolyn Moncure033 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Bullard + Amy Boschen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Corrine Cooper
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Anne Sansom
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Alexis Bullard
12W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.