Teams

Mitchell/Bentonville/KTC

2026 Mixed 18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 · 2.5 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-21vs Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRob Wallace / Elizabeth Wallace vs Kelsey Van Slyke / John Colucci5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAkshay Taneja / Kelsey Lewis vs Mary Ruoff / Alex Ruoff6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Adams / BJ Crouch vs Kelley Herr / Don Herr6-0, 6-0
2026-07-19vs Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJc Mitchell / Kelsey Lewis vs Sofie Coleman / Tanner Coleman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAkshay Taneja / Barbara Taylor vs Alex Ruoff / Kelsey Van Slyke3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Wallace / Rob Wallace vs Casey Hulliberger / Erin Hulliberger3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-16vs Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelsey Lewis / Akshay Taneja vs Sofie Coleman / Tanner Coleman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJc Mitchell / Sydney Flaig vs Jane Blommel / John Colucci3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Taylor / BJ Crouch vs Kelley Herr / Don Herr6-1, 6-2
2026-07-09vs Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDawn Adams / Akshay Taneja vs Patrick Chen / Kelsey Van Slyke6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeorge Vic Baca / Gina Baca vs Kelley Herr / Don Herr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSydney Flaig / Jc Mitchell vs Erin Hulliberger / Casey Hulliberger6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mitchell/Bentonville/KTC226614100
2Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCC226615118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Gina Baca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Sydney Flaig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Akshay Taneja
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.34
BJ Crouch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Kelsey Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.30
Dawn Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
George Vic Baca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jc Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rob Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gina Baca
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sydney Flaig
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.86
2.5
Akshay Taneja
7W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65
2.5
BJ Crouch
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Kelsey Lewis
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Dawn Adams
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
George Vic Baca
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jc Mitchell
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rob Wallace
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.