Teams

SWW-GTC-Latendresse

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexandra van Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.73
Debbie Short
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results6 ties
2023-03-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Terra Yara vs Hana Farr / Jill Gibson7-5, 6-1
2023-03-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Terra Yara vs Misa Banks / Hong Vo6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesTerra Yara / Alexandra van Hoy vs Tami Davis / Monique Eldridge6-4, 6-1
2023-02-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Terra Yara vs Debbie Gilman / Jill Gibson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJill Casale / Debbie Short vs Tonya Schmid / Liana Hunsaker7-5, 6-4
2023-02-18Split 11
W#1 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Jill Casale vs Jennifer Kohler / Molly Hunter6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebbie Short / Sally Devine Wright vs Lyna Nguyen / Akiko Kusano7-6, 6-2
2023-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Terra Yara vs Lisa Gray / Chanel Nielsen3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Alexandra van Hoy
72W–56L career
not enough data
4
Debbie Short
31W–36L career
2%98%0%
3.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.