Teams

Albers/Rase

2025 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-02vs HillWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Mylene Kempers vs Mary Corbiere / Andrea Perotti7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Wescott / Nancy Rase vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-17vs MartinLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Everline / Jean Legal vs Maria Birnkammer / Claire Rossmark3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Mylene Kempers vs Lezlie Moreland / Mary Wallace2-6, 2-6
2025-06-11vs Keegan/ShanahanLost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Rase / Ellen Gardner vs Ellyn McLaughlin / Jennifer Cohen2-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs WittingWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Everline / Shelley Sturtz vs Tina Young / Telores Hill6-0, 6-1
2025-05-24vs Keegan/ShanahanLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Rase / Jean Legal vs Dale Clark / Melissa Donato2-6, 1-6
2025-05-20vs MartinLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelissa Albers / Nancy Rase vs Maria Birnkammer / Cindy Mexcur4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Everline / Wendy Hubbert vs Kristin Draper / Shelly Frederick4-6, 0-6
2025-05-18vs HillLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Herbert / Nancy Rase vs Cindee Smith / Kim Taft1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Everline / Jennifer Mason vs Margarete Wolk / Heather Dodd3-6, 2-6
2025-04-28vs WittingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mehl / Melissa Albers vs Claris Brock / Mia Piansay3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Catherine Herbert vs Aklil Getachew / Sylvia Okala3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Rosalie Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Diana Everline
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Elizabeth Mehl
published
3.14
Nancy Rase
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Melissa Albers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Mason
published
2.87
Ellen Gardner
published
2.68
Wendy Hubbert
published
Janice Sheppard
published
Jean Legal
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Tracy Wescott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Everline + Nancy Rase5748% gamesnot enough data
Diana Everline + Rosalie Hooper134 matchesnot enough data
Rosalie Hooper + Nancy Rase123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Diana Everline
23W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Elizabeth Mehl
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Nancy Rase
43W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Melissa Albers
85W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Jennifer Mason
1W–16L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.94
Ellen Gardner
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Catherine Herbert
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Hubbert
18W–41L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Janice Sheppard
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Legal
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Wescott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.