Teams

MWalters (Carmel)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-22vs JWaleski (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Porrata / Jennifer Hutson vs Keiran Llaneza / Susie Williams0-6, 2-6
2025-09-15vs AIngalls/McGarry (CSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesErrin Jensen / Sara Porrata vs Tyler Newman / Samantha Phifer3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMeghan Walters / Megan Francis vs Amy Ingalls / Christie Garella7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-08vs JHerlong/DShealy (FCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeghan Walters / Megan Francis vs Kelly Coleman / Elizabeth Kyle6-0, 6-3
2025-09-01vs SStorck (Rama)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Walters / Stefania Faraj vs Sharon Storck / Elizabeth Murphy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-25vs MLGarrison (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSara Porrata / Courtney Reichs Mixon vs Kate Johnson / Martha Metzl5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeghan Walters / Errin Jensen vs Amie Caudle / Kimberly Battle2-6, 2-6
2025-08-18vs ABlanton/BAdams (Charlotte CC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Jensen / Courtney Reichs Mixon vs Mckay Mansmann / Anna Williams6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Beth Hahn
published 3.5
3.25
Sara Porrata
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.20
Errin Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
3.12
Debbie Starling
published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Lilly
published
3.04
Kelly Kaiser
published
3.02
Michele Simpson
published
3.01
Stefania Faraj
published
2.99
Megan Francis
published
2.93
Meghan Walters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Maureen Hussey
published
2.70
Deborah Biggers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Porrata + Meghan Walters5169% gamesnot enough data
Sara Porrata + Errin Jensen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Hahn
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Sara Porrata
65W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Errin Jensen
39W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Courtney Reichs Mixon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Debbie Starling
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kelly Lilly
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kelly Kaiser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Michele Simpson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Stefania Faraj
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Megan Francis
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.99
3
Meghan Walters
44W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Maureen Hussey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.83
3
Deborah Biggers
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.