Teams

PRC - Roberts

2025 B'ham Combo - 55 & Over W · N, Saturday

8 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJan Sawyer / Regina Bates vs Lisa Kendrick / Angela Rembert7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesValerie Holmes / Jan Sawyer vs Angela Chandler / Tabitha Hardman6-3, 6-0
2025-06-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesRegina Bates / Jan Sawyer vs Rhonda Adams / Joni Roberson6-3, 6-2
2025-05-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesJan Sawyer / Regina Bates vs Kelley Roach / Renee Youngblood6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRegina Bates / Jan Sawyer vs Tammy McClure / Charlene Linson7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for N, Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jan Sawyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Suzanne Sevin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Laura Partain
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.38
Valerie Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
3.24
Tammy Woodham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Kristi Tolbert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Regina Bates
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Kim Cullum
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Partain + Valerie Holmes4449% games−8.4% vs expected
Regina Bates + Jan Sawyer4157% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Sevin + Valerie Holmes213 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Tolbert + Regina Bates033 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Tolbert + Tammy Woodham033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jan Sawyer
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Suzanne Sevin
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Laura Partain
15W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Valerie Holmes
67W–36L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tammy Woodham
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kristi Tolbert
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Regina Bates
40W–45L career · 10 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Kim Cullum
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.