Teams

Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Men, S

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-13vs Indy A55 7.0M IND ChopLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Freeman / Moon Kim vs Keith Chop / Todd Eikenberry1-6, 0-6
2026-08-06vs Indy A55 7.0M CRC BrosiusLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Webber / Mark Timmis vs Daniel Nelson / Mauricio Manzur3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDarrell Johnson / Milton Jackson vs Michael Flis / Steven Warner3-6, 2-6
2026-07-30vs Indy A55 7.0M DCC McNallyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Schwarz / David Webber vs Daniel Somers / Chris Paberzs6-4, 6-3
2026-07-23vs Indy A55 7.0M IRCD GuptaLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarrell Johnson / Milton Jackson vs Steven Walsmith / George Devoe1-6, 2-6
2026-07-09vs Indy A55 7.0M IND ChopLost 01
L#3 DoublesDarrell Johnson / Milton Jackson vs Terry Warrum / Greg Reasner3-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs Indy A55 7.0M CRC BrosiusLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlan Friedman / Moon Kim vs Kurt Lang / Stephen Berggren1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDarrell Johnson / Milton Jackson vs Michael Flis / Mark Ehrman2-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs Indy A55 7.0M DCC McNallySplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlan Friedman / Moon Kim vs Kyle Grayson / Darcy Schmidt6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Schwarz / David Webber vs Bert Nickelsberg / Thomas Dempsey6-7, 1-6
2026-06-11vs Indy A55 7.0M IRCD GuptaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEdward Freeman / Moon Kim vs Steven Walsmith / Jay Love6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDarrell Johnson / Milton Jackson vs Ronald Ruff / Steve Piepenbrink1-6, 6-7
2026-06-04Split 11
L#2 DoublesEdward Freeman / Moon Kim vs Brad Matheny / James Jackson5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJames Schwarz / David Webber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Men, S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy A55 7.0M IND Chop9123716214
2Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Dalton9122822244
3Indy A55 7.0M CRC Brosius3681939267
4Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman3792143306
5Indy A55 7.0M DCC McNally1781635246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
David Webber
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.00
Moon Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Milton Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Webber
79W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Moon Kim
28W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.00
Milton Jackson
0W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.