Teams

RTC-Sloppy Aces-Armellino

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.64 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-04vs BETC-BrownSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCrystal Vo / Alex Woodward vs Joseph Dela Cruz / Katie O'Riley3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesParis Yandall / Aswin Krishnan vs Tuan Nguyen / Sheryl Brown2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-12vs BETC-BrownSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex Woodward / Divya Manohar vs Joseph Dela Cruz / Jessica Janner3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackson Cobb / Madhuri Deo vs Baraka Brown / Ingrid Bakke4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-04vs NWW-AYTC-UenoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJackson Cobb / Liza Skorupski vs Avery Howard / Catherine Cable6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDonny Baugh / Divya Manohar vs Olivia Headford / John Gallelli4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-22vs NWW-AYTC-TaisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJackson Cobb / Lauren Joung vs Kevin Hsieh / Mia Nguyen6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Armellino / Paris Yandall vs Elise Kang / Shubhu Purohit3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-16Won 21
W#1 DoublesJackson Cobb / Diana Linehan vs Alex Namba / Christine Yang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Woodward / Madhuri Deo vs Samantha Sweet / Kelvin Yuchen0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDaniel Armellino / Paris Yandall vs Candice Canley / Spencer Watanabe7-6, 7-5
2022-10-01vs NWW-AYTC-UenoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLauren Joung / Alex Woodward vs Khaliun Enkhjargal / James Crosetto3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJustin Tran / Paris Yandall vs Olivia Headford / Nishaant Limaye7-6, 6-4
2022-09-23vs NTC-Mixing it up-Link 10.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMadhuri Deo / Alex Woodward vs Michael Okada / Kailyn Skjonsby6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJackson Cobb / Liza Skorupski vs Stephen Chang / Lora Edens3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-18vs CP-StewartLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackson Cobb / Crystal Vo vs Ross Laursen / Joanna Stewart4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 10.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-AYTC-Tais6216820195
2NWW-AYTC-Ueno53131124208
3BETC-Brown53121225211
4NWW-AYTC-Godfrey53131127211
5CP-Stewart44131128234
6RTC-Sloppy Aces-Armellino35121231247
7NTC-Mixing it up-Link 10.00851942270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Jackson Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.80
Divya Manohar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Alex Woodward
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
Donny Baugh
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.73
Daniel Armellino
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 5
4.67
Reanne Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.35
Madhuri Deo
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.34
Justin Tran
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.26
Diana Linehan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
Joanna Tang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Lauren Joung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 4.5
4.16
Aswin Krishnan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Liza Skorupski
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Crystal Vo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Paris Yandall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Armellino + Diana Linehan6255% games+6.6% vs expected
Aswin Krishnan + Diana Linehan4263% games+2.3% vs expected
Daniel Armellino + Donny Baugh314 matchesnot enough data
Justin Tran + Lauren Joung213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jackson Cobb
23W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Divya Manohar
65W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Alex Woodward
4W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Donny Baugh
83W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Daniel Armellino
137W–89L career · 17 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Reanne Lee
88W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.67
4.5
Madhuri Deo
53W–23L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Justin Tran
63W–32L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Diana Linehan
46W–17L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Joanna Tang
56W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Lauren Joung
68W–83L career · 12 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Aswin Krishnan
89W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
4
Liza Skorupski
99W–76L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Crystal Vo
27W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Paris Yandall
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.