Teams

Westwood Kelly

2024 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-09vs Burkwood Loos/SinsabaughSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Baker / Megan Alwine vs Erin Decker / Adam Decker6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTodd Prince / Bobbie Lou Oley vs Will Hart / Lindsey O'Kane0-6, 2-6
2024-10-27vs Huguenot Park Stephens 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Alwine / Ryan Baker vs Ana Adkins / Dale Nowery1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-20vs Hermitage WycinskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Alwine / Ryan Baker vs Aynsley Fisher / Andrew Bolyard6-0, 6-0
2024-10-05vs Avalon 8.5 Mixed - GreenWon 10
W#2 DoublesBobbie Lou Oley / Fred Walker vs Lucinda Stuckey / Byron Holmes6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Kevin Long
published
4.38
Fred Walker
published
4.32
Megan Alwine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
published
4.17
Todd Prince
published
4.16
Ryan Baker
published
3.86
Gil Elmaleh
published
3.82
Andrew Cecil
published 4
3.82
Kory Painter
published
3.79
Craig Heah
published 4
3.69
Bobbie Lou Oley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lauren Jones
published
3.57
Dutch Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Dutch Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Long
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.40
Fred Walker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.38
4.5
Megan Alwine
110W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
Todd Prince
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Ryan Baker
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.16
Gil Elmaleh
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Andrew Cecil
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Kory Painter
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Craig Heah
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Bobbie Lou Oley
139W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Lauren Jones
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Dutch Jones
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.