Teams

Da.Knox55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-26vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesHai Le / Gerard Auvergne vs Istvan Pataki / Mark Osborn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-18vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesGerard Auvergne / John Parsons vs Mark Osborn / Michael Marchi3-6, 2-6
2025-04-18vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Knox / Hai Le vs John Bruckel / Jack Pyritz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Miller / Pete Vammino vs Michael Marchi / Alan Crews4-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesGerard Auvergne / Hai Le vs OLLI-PEKKA Salovaara / Alan Crews4-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesPete Vammino / Chris Fuhrer vs Istvan Pataki / Joey Jacobs6-7, 6-7
2025-03-15vs Jo.Bruckel55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesHai Le / Gerard Auvergne vs John Bruckel / Jack Pyritz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesGerard Auvergne / Hai Le vs John Bruckel / Jack Pyritz1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Fuhrer / Pete Vammino vs Joey Jacobs / Istvan Pataki5-7, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Jo.Bruckel55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMiguel Materin / Thomas Zietlow vs Alan Crews / Gregory Kash6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
David Rowe
published 4
3.63
Hai Le
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Gerard Auvergne
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Pete Vammino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Thomas Zietlow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Chris Fuhrer
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.14
Ben Barnhill
published 3.5
Miguel Materin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Zietlow + Gerard Auvergne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Rowe
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Hai Le
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Gerard Auvergne
46W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Pete Vammino
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Thomas Zietlow
42W–66L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Chris Fuhrer
73W–97L career · 11 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Ben Barnhill
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Miguel Materin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.