Teams

Brown 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesKrisla Berreth / Sallye Parker vs Kim Taylor / Stephanie Farabow6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-09-18vs Albright 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobyn Manning / Minerva Loran vs Britt Flanagan / Emily Wilson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-11vs Goodman/Scott 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Jacqueline Herron vs Andrea Pollina / Diane Kroeger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobyn Manning / Vangie Cruz vs Melissa Goodman / Kimberly Gay4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Debra Jessup vs Marianne Millikan / Mary Fowler1-6, 6-7
2024-08-21vs BECK 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Debra Jessup vs Kimberly Lancaster / Kathy Chinnis6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSallye Parker / Vangie Cruz vs Suzanne Johnson / Stephanie Farabow0-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Tara Burgio
published
3.68
Ann Evans
published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.52
Nan Elizabeth Joyce
published
3.44
Jacqueline Herron
published
3.35
Marsha Tice
published
3.31
Tammie Hughes
published
3.31
Kathy Brown
published
3.30
Vangie Cruz
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.25
Robyn Manning
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Debra Jessup
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nan Elizabeth Joyce + Vangie Cruz3352% games+1.7% vs expected
Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Burgio
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Ann Evans
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Nan Elizabeth Joyce
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jacqueline Herron
36W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Tammie Hughes
21W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kathy Brown
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Vangie Cruz
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Robyn Manning
139W–69L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Debra Jessup
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.